peaq
Independent peaq review: the DePIN Layer-1 for machines, PEAQ tokenomics, enterprise pilots, and why the chain earns almost nothing in fees.
A well-engineered Machine Economy L1 with 60+ DePINs and enterprise partnerships, but the chain collects a rounding error in gas and the busiest app on it is shrinking.
- + Purpose-built machine-economy primitives: DIDs, M2M payments, on-chain access control
- + 60+ live DePINs and enterprise pilots with NTT, Airbus, Bosch, Continental
- + Open-source Rust core with a 97.96/100 CertiK audit
- − 45% insider allocation concentrates voting power and future sell pressure
- − The chain earns a rounding error in gas, so the Machine Economy thesis is still ahead of the market
- − Polkadot parachain dependency limits independent sovereignty
peaq is a well-engineered open-source L1 secured through Polkadot, with a small, concentrated collator set (33 collators for 42 slots, four holding about a third of backing). Strong audit history and active GitHub presence. However, 45% insider allocation, Polkadot parachain dependency, enterprise-focused partnerships, and lack of privacy features limit the sovereignty case.
Freedom Score 52/100 (D) reflects a solid technical foundation with centralised control dynamics.
Infrastructure decentralisation11/20 Overstated· 2 checks
Polkadot parachain secured by Relay Chain validators, with DPoS/NPoS collators. peaq reports 49K TPS. As a parachain, peaq depends on Polkadot for security and is not independently sovereign. The collator set is now measured (integrity validator_set_and_selection, 24 September 2026): 33 active collators for 42 slots, so selection is uncontested; the largest holds 14.2% of backing, four hold about a third (Nakamoto coefficient 4), and the top ten hold 74.8%. Collators self-bond about 0.18% of the stake behind them; the rest is delegated. peaq's claim to the 'highest Nakamoto Coefficients in the industry' is graded inflated on that measurement. Enterprise focus (NTT, Bosch, Airbus) suggests some centralisation in key partnerships.
“Validators need to provide a staking deposit to run a Validator node to have “skin in the game”. Delegators can delegate their stake to Validators of their choice in order to back them. Only those Validators with enough backing (stake) are able to produce blocks.” source →
The set is small and the selection is not currently a contest. Session.Validators holds 33 active validators, ParachainStaking.CounterForCandidatePool holds 33 candidates, and MaxSelectedCandidates is 42, so every candidate that exists is selected and the 'only those with enough backing' filter does not bind on anyone today. Stake behind those 33 is concentrated: the largest holds 14.2% of total backing, three reach a third, five reach half, and the top ten hold 74.8%. Skin in the game is thin in the literal sense: TotalCollatorStake splits as 2,264,713 PEAQ posted by validators against 1,222,689,348 PEAQ delegated, so validators put up about 0.18% of the stake standing behind them. Read peaq consensus state directly over the public Substrate RPC (peaq.api.onfinality.io, a third-party provider rather than a peaq-operated endpoint) with state_getStorage against keys built from twox128 pallet/item hashes. No @polkadot tooling was available, so twox128 was implemented from the xxhash64 spec and validated against the published vector twox128('System') == 0x26aa394eea5630e07c48ae0c9558cef7 before any key was trusted. Values SCALE-decoded: Session.Validators and ParachainStaking.TopCandidates as compact-prefixed vectors, TotalCollatorStake as two little-endian u128s, the counters as u32. Ingestion only, verdict human-set.
Verified The mechanism is deployed as described: validators post a deposit and delegators back them. The backing filter does not bind today, because there are fewer candidates than slots, and validators' own deposits are about 0.18% of the stake behind them. peaq is a parachain, so this layer governs liveness and inclusion while the Relay Chain provides settlement security.
“Funds in this pool are used to add additional security to peaq, such as the purchase of Coretime, which significantly increases peaq’s security and censorship resistance and provides peaq with the highest Nakamoto Coefficients [decentralization index] in the industry.” source →
Not supported on the layer peaq operates. Taking the Nakamoto coefficient in its usual sense, the smallest number of entities that must collude to control a subsystem, peaq's block production reads 3 on 2026-09-29 (4 on 2026-09-24, 3 on 2026-09-18): three validators hold a third of total backing. Measured the same way in the same fortnight, Oasis needs seven entities to reach a third of active escrow, and Flux needs eleven distinct producers to reach half its blocks. The claim is defensible only if it is read as being about the Polkadot Relay Chain's validator set, which peaq buys Coretime from and does not itself operate. Read peaq consensus state directly over the public Substrate RPC (peaq.api.onfinality.io, a third-party provider rather than a peaq-operated endpoint) with state_getStorage against keys built from twox128 pallet/item hashes. No @polkadot tooling was available, so twox128 was implemented from the xxhash64 spec and validated against the published vector twox128('System') == 0x26aa394eea5630e07c48ae0c9558cef7 before any key was trusted. Values SCALE-decoded: Session.Validators and ParachainStaking.TopCandidates as compact-prefixed vectors, TotalCollatorStake as two little-endian u128s, the counters as u32. Ingestion only, verdict human-set. The comparison set is our own, measured on the same days by the same definition, which is the only reason a superlative like 'highest in the industry' is checkable at all. It is a floor on the counter-example rather than an industry census: two chains beating the claim is enough to refute 'highest', and no wider survey was run.
Overstated Graded on the sentence as written, which attaches the superlative to peaq rather than to the Polkadot Relay Chain it buys Coretime from. peaq has since removed the sentence: it is on the tokenomics page in captures from July 2025 to 2026-05-18 and absent from the live page on 2026-09-23. Kept because it was published for at least ten months; attributing the coefficient to the Relay Chain would have been accurate.
Governance decentralisation9/20
Substrate governance module enables on-chain proposals and voting. Standard Polkadot-style governance. However, 45% insider allocation (team + investors) concentrates voting power. EoT Labs GmbH in Berlin controls development direction. Governance participation data not available.
Token distribution fairness5/15 Established
45% insider allocation: Core Team 11.5% + EoT Labs 8.5% + Pre-Seed 7% + Seed 5% + Private Sale 13%. Community-accessible allocation is 21% (Community Initiatives 15% + Launchpad 6%). Ecosystem & Treasury (20%) is team-controlled. Only about half of supply is circulating.
Ten unattributed accounts hold 39.08% of issued PEAQ, one of them 19.01%, and none of the ten is a pallet account. Every account on the chain was enumerated rather than sampled: 3,393,045 System.Account entries against Balances.TotalIssuance of 4,446,080,550 PEAQ. Ten accounts hold 39.08% of issuance and one of them holds 19.01% (845,247,094 PEAQ) on its own; the next largest is 3.27%. Not one of the top ten is a pallet account, checked by the raw b"modl" prefix that identifies every pallet account whatever its id, so none of this is protocol plumbing. The largest positions are staked. The 19.01% account carries a Balances.Locks entry with lock id "peaqstak" over 249,555,360 PEAQ, and the 2.30% account carries one over 101,000,000 PEAQ of its 102,075,124 total. peaq's own explorer classifies both as Role: Nominator and shows 679 and 330 reward events respectively, so these are not dormant positions. Attribution to a named entity is still not possible: On-chain Identity reads Not Set, the Subscan profile is Hidden, and no label exists for any of the ten. Balances are free + reserved. A delegation on parachain-staking is locked in place rather than transferred, so a staker's full position is counted and this is ownership, not the liquid subset an Akash-style Cosmos bank read returns; the two are not comparable. Pallet accounts are identified by the b"modl" address prefix rather than by guessing pallet ids one at a time. Storage keys are built from a twox128 implementation checked against two prefixes already hardcoded in our own indexer (System.Account and Balances.TotalIssuance) before any new key was trusted, and every storage item is probed for chain-wide existence before an absence on one account is read as a measurement: Vesting.Vesting, Balances.Locks, Balances.Reserves, ParachainStaking.DelegatorState, CandidatePool and AtStake all return keys, while Identity.IdentityOf and four other ParachainStaking items are empty chain-wide and prove nothing. Ingestion only, verdict human-set.
Established Score held at 5/15. Attribution is missing in both directions: a 19% holder could be an exchange as easily as a founder, and unattributed is not evidence of insider control. Balances.Locks is the read that settles staking status; one absent staking storage item does not.
Censorship resistance8/15 Established
Permissionless chain — anyone can deploy EVM or WASM contracts. Machine identities (DIDs) are self-sovereign. Polkadot Relay Chain provides shared security. However, Polkadot parachain dependency means peaq's liveness depends on maintaining a parachain slot. Enterprise integrations may introduce compliance requirements.
Collator entry on peaq is open because the candidate pool is below the slot cap, and collators post a fraction of a percent of the stake behind them. Collator selection is currently uncontested: there are fewer candidates than slots. 33 active collators against 42 slots, so selection is uncontested, with collators posting 0.19% of the stake and the rest delegated. Consensus set read from each chain's own endpoint by scripts/refresh-validator-sets.ts: active validators, stake shares and the NAKAMOTO HALT COEFFICIENT, which is the fewest validators whose combined stake exceeds one third. That is the BFT liveness threshold on these chains and it is NOT the 51% control figure the two get confused for, which is why the output carries nakamoto_basis. Censorship needs the halt number rather than the set size: a chain with a hundred validators and a coefficient of five is five colluding parties away from stopping.
Established Anyone who applies as a collator gets a slot while the pool is unfilled, which is open entry but also means no competitive pressure and no spare capacity if operators leave. Almost all stake is delegated, so block producers have little capital of their own at risk.
Data sovereignty8/15
peaq ID provides self-sovereign machine identities (W3C DID compliant). peaq store enables verifiable machine data storage on-chain. Data verification via peaq verify. However, no privacy-preserving computation — data stored is visible on-chain. No encryption guarantees for machine data beyond what applications implement.
Open source transparency11/15 Established
97 public GitHub repos (41 original, 56 forks). Core chain node repo is 98.3% Rust, actively maintained with recent commits. Multiple audits from CertiK (97.96/100) and SRL. SDKs in JS, Python, Rust all open source. Good transparency for an L1 chain. Score limited because SRL audit reports are not publicly readable.
peaq's parachain node is public on GitHub under the Apache-2.0 licence and is actively maintained. Re-read 2026-09-18 through the GitHub API: 43 non-fork public repositories in github.com/peaqnetwork (100 public in total, 57 of them forks), 8 with no licence file and 32 not pushed in 180 days. The core peaq-network-node (the Substrate/Polkadot parachain node) is Apache-2.0, 81 stars, not archived, pushed 2026-07-20. The chain node and pallets are public under a permissive licence. Direct GitHub org/repo metadata reads. Ingestion only, verdict human-set.
Established Counted on a non-fork basis, because counting forks credits a project for code it did not write.
Overall returns potential is below average at 46/100. Strongest dimension: token utility (15/20). Weakest: revenue sustainability (7/25).
Token utility15/20
Gas fees, staking (DPoS/NPoS), governance, machine identity registration, M2M payments. Token structurally essential to chain. 60+ DePINs use PEAQ.
Value accrual9/20
Transaction fees in PEAQ. 30% of block rewards to validators and delegators since runtime spec 113 (40% before). No fee distribution to non-stakers. The chain's own gas take is a rounding error, so fee accrual is negligible. VEO channels 10% of proceeds to MachineX liquidity.
Supply dynamics9/20 Verified
No max supply. Inflation started at 3.5% and is scheduled at ~3.15% in Year 2; peaq's docs describe no fee burn. A little over half of total supply circulating. 45% insider allocation. VEO programme channels early investor exits through vested discounted sales. Well-structured but ongoing dilution.
“The inflation rate is initially set at 3.5%, ensuring sufficient incentives for early adopters. However, the inflation rate will decrease annually by 10% and will stabilize once the network reaches 1% inflation, following a disinflationary model.” source →
Issued supply reads 4,441,653,521 PEAQ on chain, against 4,200,000,000 at genesis, so emissions have added roughly six percent since launch. 28.35% of the issued total is bonded behind 33 collators. Total issued PEAQ read straight off the chain: Balances.TotalIssuance via state_getStorage on peaq's own RPC, with the storage key built from twox128(pallet) ++ twox128(item) and the hash self-tested against the published twox128("System") vector before any read is trusted. peaq has NO MAX SUPPLY, so issued total is the only honest denominator for any percentage on this chain; there is no cap to measure against.
Verified The on-chain reading sits within about one month's emissions of the disinflation table on the same peaq page. peaq has no max supply, so issued total is the only denominator for any percentage of supply.
Revenue sustainability7/25 Established· 2 checks
High reported usage: 40.4M Q3 2025 transactions per peaq, 60+ DePINs, enterprise partners (NTT, Airbus, Bosch). Fees split two ways and neither covers emissions: peaq's own gas take is a rounding error, and MachineX, the main DEX on it, bills tens of thousands a year and is shrinking. Activity without monetisation.
Application billing on peaq, led by MachineX, has recovered from its trough but remains far below its peak month. MachineX, the busiest application on peaq, billed $21,222 over the trailing 30 days, re-read 2026-10-20 ($23,854 on 2026-09-24, $21,201 on 2026-09-18, and $5,103 when this was first authored), so application billing has levelled off well below the peak month of $166,363 in October 2025. Trailing-30d fees annualised, with the monthly series read to establish the trend. Kept separate from the chain-gas row on purpose: summing an application's revenue into a chain's fee line is the error that produced the retired combined figure.
Established Kept separate from the chain-fee row because the two figures have different owners. Re-anchored 2026-09-18; the move that crossed the band was a recovery.
Little DeFi capital sits on peaq: chain TVL is well under a million dollars. $897,443 total value locked across peaq chains, re-read 2026-09-29 ($785,427 on 2026-09-24, $677,752 on 2026-09-18). DeFiLlama chain-TVL sum, refreshed by scripts/refresh-primary.ts into meta.primary_data.
Established Measures DeFi capital on peaq and says nothing about DePIN device economics. It bounds any argument that on-chain financial activity could fund the network. Re-anchored 2026-09-18.
Liquidity & access6/15 Established
Kraken, KuCoin, Gate.io, MEXC, Bitget and Crypto.com. Binance carries no PEAQ spot pair as of September 2026. On Solana since 8 September 2026 via the Sunrise gateway, with about 22M PEAQ bridged and one Raydium pool at a 24 September read. Thin but evenly spread across its venues; adequate for small-to-medium positions.
PEAQ trades on Kraken, KuCoin, Gate, MEXC, Bitget and Crypto.com with thin but evenly spread depth; Binance has no PEAQ spot pair. 25 tickers on 20 venues on CoinGecko, re-read 2026-10-20 (29 on 2026-10-07, 40 on 2026-09-29, 47 on 2026-09-24). Kraken, KuCoin, Gate, MEXC, Bitget and Crypto.com Exchange all trade PEAQ, Binance's exchangeInfo returns PEAQUSDT as an invalid symbol, and depth is thin but spread, the largest venue (a PancakeSwap pool on BSC) at 17.4% of 24h volume and Gate at 14.1%. Paginated the CoinGecko ticker set, summed 24h volume per venue, then enumerated every Binance spot symbol with PEAQ as the base asset. Binance Alpha and futures were not checked and neither would be a main-spot listing.
Established No venue dominates the flow, so the book is thin but not concentrated. Binance Alpha and futures were not checked, and neither would be a main-spot listing.
Not financial advice. Scores are opinions, not recommendations. Crypto is high-risk – you could lose everything you invest. Full disclaimer.
Embed this rating
The badge updates automatically when the score changes.
On this page
Machine identity, M2M payments, fee burn, five-bucket emission split
Machines register on-chain through peaq ID (W3C DID-compliant self-sovereign identity) and acquire role-based permissions via peaq access. They transact natively with peaq pay for M2M micropayments and post data through peaq verify and peaq store. A fee burn destroys a portion of every transaction; the remaining emission splits 40% to validators and delegators, 25% to General Treasury, 20% to the DePIN Incentive Pool, 10% to Security Treasury (Polkadot coretime) and 5% to the Machine Subsidisation Pool.
peaq review: the verdict
peaq is a well-built Layer-1 for machine identity and payments, and it hosts a broad roster of DePIN projects and enterprise pilots. The chain earns almost nothing from that activity: its gas take is a rounding error against its emissions, so holders are paid in new tokens rather than in fees. Nearly half the token allocation went to insiders, a six-member council runs governance, and the chain depends on keeping its Polkadot slot. It scores low on both Freedom and Returns, a credible machine-economy bet that has yet to turn usage into value.
What it does
peaq is a Layer-1 blockchain built specifically for what it calls the “Machine Economy”: a world where machines, vehicles, robots, and IoT devices operate as first-class economic participants. Not controlled by humans through apps, but transacting autonomously: a car paying for its own charging, a drone selling its weather data, a robot renting its idle time.
Built on Substrate and running as a Polkadot parachain, peaq provides native modules that are built into the chain itself, not deployed as smart contracts:
- peaq ID – Self-sovereign machine identities (W3C DID-compliant). Every machine gets a decentralised identity.
- peaq access – Role-based access control for machine-to-machine permissions
- peaq verify – On-chain verification of machine data
- peaq store – Key-value storage for verifiable machine data
- peaq pay – Machine-to-machine payment infrastructure
- UMT – Nanosecond-precision time synchronisation for coordinated machine operations
The chain supports both EVM (Solidity) and WASM (Rust/ink!) smart contracts, so developers can build in whichever environment they prefer. peaq’s Q3 2025 report puts performance at approximately 49,000 TPS with 500ms blockBlockA batch of transactions added to a blockchain at a set interval. Each block cryptographically links to the previous one, creating an append-only chain that can't be rewritten without redoing all the work since.Like a page in a ledger. Every page has a fixed number of entries, every page references the previous page, and once a page is filled and signed off it can't be edited without visibly invalidating every page that came after. The chain is just a very long series of these sealed pages.Block in the glossary → finalisation, with a target of 100,000+ TPS.
Founded in 2017 by Till Wendler, Leonard Dorlochter, and Max Thake. The entity behind peaq is EoT Labs GmbH, registered in Berlin, Germany. Max Thake previously built Advanced Blockchain AG, the first blockchain development company listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The team delivered blockchain solutions for Audi before starting peaq. Michael Ganser, former CEO of Cisco Germany, is an advisor.
Mainnet launched November 2024. Its Kusama canary network, krest, has been retired: peaq’s node repository removed the krest runtime in September 2026 (PR #397), stating the network is decommissioned, and krest’s public RPC endpoint no longer answers.
Value proposition
Machine-native primitives
Self-sovereign DIDs, M2M payments, and access control built into the protocol, not bolted on as smart contracts.
60+ DePINs on one chain
Teneo, DeNet, Silencio, MapMetrics and dozens more, plus enterprise partners NTT, Airbus, Bosch.
Activity without monetisation
A reported 40.4M quarterly transactions and enterprise pilots, but the gas the chain itself collects rounds to nothing.
Network scale. peaq has assembled 60+ DePINs (Decentralised Physical InfrastructureDePINDecentralised Physical Infrastructure Networks. Protocols that use token incentives to coordinate real-world physical infrastructure like GPU compute, wireless networks, storage, mapping sensors, or bandwidth.Like crowd-sourced ride-sharing but for physical hardware. Uber incentivises drivers with dollars. DePIN incentivises hardware operators with tokens. The network grows because individuals choose to contribute capacity in exchange for rewards.DePIN in the glossary → Networks) across 22 industries on a single chain. The major ones:
- Teneo – claims 6M+ community nodes across 190 countries (social data crowdsourcing)
- DeNet – claims 6M+ storage users, 9 petabytes stored, 15M files secured
- Silencio – claims 1.2M+ users across 180+ countries (noise pollution data for AI trainingTrainingThe one-time process of teaching a neural network to perform a task by showing it massive amounts of example data and adjusting its internal weights until the outputs are good. Training builds the model; inference uses it.Like the years an apprentice spends learning a trade. You don't see any of the actual work, just thousands of repeated mistakes gradually becoming competence. By the end, the apprentice can do the job. The training was invisible, but the skill is now permanent.Training in the glossary →)
- MapMetrics – claims 200,000+ drivers (community navigation)
- SkyX – claims 26,000 contributors from 125 countries, 125TB+ decentralised weather data
- XMAQUINA – claims $35M+ DAO treasury investing in robotics companies
- Bistroo – claims 200,000+ active users, $18.6M food delivery volume
Enterprise partnerships include NTT, Continental, Airbus, Mastercard, Bosch, and Gaia. peaq’s Q3 2025 report counts 40.4 million transactions for the quarter.
The counter-narrative is simple: activity without monetisation. Sixty DePINs, millions of users, enterprise logos, and the chain itself takes in roughly 429.9 thousand PEAQ a year in gas on our own sampling of its EVM layer. That is a floor rather than a total, and it still earns the chain less in a year than a single restaurant. TVLTVLTotal Value Locked. The sum of all assets currently deposited in a protocol's smart contracts. TVL is the standard measure of how much capital a DeFi or DeAI protocol is custodying.Like the assets under management of a hedge fund. AUM tells you how much money the fund has been trusted with, which is a rough proxy for how much business it's doing. TVL plays the same role for crypto protocols.TVL in the glossary → remains negligible for an L1L1Layer 1. A base blockchain that runs its own consensus mechanism, executes transactions, and settles its own state. Bitcoin, Ethereum, NEAR, and Solana are all L1s. Anything built on top of an L1 is technically a Layer 2 or higher.Like the foundation of a building. Nothing else can exist on top until the foundation is solid. Different L1s make different tradeoffs for what kind of building they can support.L1 in the glossary → chain.
It is worth separating the two layers, because they get quoted as one number and they belong to different people. Gas is what peaq earns. Fees on MachineX, the busiest application on the chain, are what MachineX earns, and at about $268.1K a year they are the larger of the two by a wide margin. Counting them as peaq’s revenue would credit a landlord with his tenant’s takings.
The Machine Economy thesis is directionally correct. Machines will increasingly need to transact. The question is timing. On the evidence of what anyone actually pays to use the chain, the answer for 2026 is not yet.
For the sovereignty thesis, peaq provides self-sovereign machine identities and permissionless infrastructure. But it isn’t privacy-preserving: data on peaq is visible on-chain. And as a Polkadot parachain, the chain’s security depends on maintaining its parachain slotSlotA fixed time interval during which a single block can be produced on a Proof of Stake blockchain. Slots are the smallest unit of consensus time and group together to form epochs.Like a 12-second window in a relay race during which exactly one runner is supposed to be on the track. If the runner shows up and completes their leg, the race continues. If they're absent, the slot is empty and the next runner starts the next slot.Slot in the glossary →. It’s infrastructure for machines to operate independently, which is a different but related angle on sovereignty.
peaq’s DePIN positioning: why 60+ projects chose this chain
Sixty-plus DePINs have built on peaq. The interesting question is why they chose this chain over Solana, Base, or Ethereum.
Specialisation is the answer. General-purpose blockchains treat machines the same as humans: you need a walletWalletSoftware that stores the private keys needed to control tokens on a blockchain. A wallet does not actually hold any tokens. The tokens live on the chain. The wallet holds the keys that prove you own them.Like the key to a safe deposit box. The key doesn't contain your valuables. The valuables sit in the bank's vault. The key is what proves you're allowed to open the box and take them.Wallet in the glossary →, you sign transactions, you interact with smart contracts. peaq treats machines as first-class economic participants with native infrastructure built into the chain itself, not deployed as smart contracts, but embedded at the protocol level.
peaq IDs give every machine a self-sovereign identity compliant with W3C DID standards. A car, a drone, a sensor array. Each gets a decentralised identity that persists across applications without depending on a centralised registry. This is the foundation: machines cannot transact autonomously if they cannot prove who they are.
peaq Pay handles machine-to-machine micropayments natively. When a drone sells its weather data to an insurance company, the payment settles on-chain without human intervention. The fee structure is designed for high-frequency, low-value transactions that would be prohibitively expensive on Ethereum.
peaq Access provides role-based permissions for machine interactions. A fleet of delivery robots can be granted access to a warehouse’s loading dock programmatically, with permissions that expire, rotate, and audit automatically.
Enterprise partnerships validate the thesis at pilot level: NTT, Continental, Airbus, Mastercard, Bosch, Gaia. These are not marketing logos. NTT is running a data marketplace pilot. Airbus is exploring decentralised drone identity. Bosch is evaluating supply chain verification. But the distance between “exploring” and “production deployment generating revenue” is vast. In construction, we call this the gap between letters of intent and executed contracts. peaq has the letters.
Honestly: the technology is purpose-built and well-engineered. The 60+ DePINs are working projects building shipping applications. But what anyone actually pays to use the chain tells you the Machine Economy is still ahead of the market. The infrastructure is ready. The machines are not yet transacting at scale.
robotic.sh: services behind peaqOS
robotic.sh is peaq’s own market for services a machine can call through peaqOS. On 24 September 2026 it listed 20 services, 14 marked Ready and 6 marked Setup, where the operator must configure credentials first. Two recent additions show where the edges are:
- Allora (announced 3 September 2026). A machine can read Allora’s collective inferences free and keyless, or register as an Allora inference worker. The worker leg is operator-paid: the operator registers from its own wallet, and peaqOS verifies the transaction but signs nothing. The adapter page quotes a 50,000,000 uallo fee, which is Allora’s testnet parameter; the mainnet chain’s
registration_feereads 1 ALLO. - World ID (announced 21 August 2026). A machine can check a zero-knowledge proof that a person holds a World ID without learning who they are. It’s listed as Setup, since the operator must first create and run its own World app.
peaq’s Allora post calls machines autonomous “without human intervention”, which the adapter page supports for the read leg only, and its Unitree G1 humanoid demo was simulated in NVIDIA’s Isaac Sim. Neither route pays peaq anything visible: Allora reads are free, worker fees go to Allora, and World ID checks run through World’s own API.
How peaq compares to other DePIN infrastructure
peaq made a bet: build a chain specifically for machines rather than adapting a general-purpose chain. How does that bet compare?
peaq vs Solana. Solana hosts more DePINs by market cap (Helium, Render, Hivemapper). The liquidityLiquidityHow easily a token can be bought or sold without moving the price. High liquidity means you can enter or exit large positions quickly at the quoted price. Low liquidity means even small trades can swing the market.Like the difference between selling a house and selling a share of Apple stock. The house might be worth more on paper, but finding a buyer at that price takes weeks. The Apple share converts to cash in one click.Liquidity in the glossary → is deeper, the developer tools are more mature, and the user base is larger. But Solana treats DePIN the same as DeFiDeFiDecentralised Finance. Financial services like lending, trading, and yield farming built on smart contracts instead of traditional banks or brokerages. DeFi protocols are usually permissionless and global.Like a vending machine that can give you a loan, swap your currencies, or invest your savings. Nobody is behind the counter, the rules are written into the machine itself, and anyone with money in the right format can use it.DeFi in the glossary → or NFTs: generic smart contracts on a fast chain. peaq’s native machine identity, M2M payments, and access control modules are purpose-built. The trade-off is network size (Solana wins) versus specialisation (peaq wins).
peaq vs IoTeX. The closest competitor in the machine-specific L1 space. IoTeX focuses on “DePIN as a Service” with W3bstream middleware for off-chain compute verification. peaq focuses on on-chain machine identity and payments. IoTeX has a longer track record (mainnet since 2019) but smaller DePIN count. Both are betting that machines need specialised infrastructure. Neither has proven the commercial case yet.
peaq vs Polkadot. As a Polkadot parachain, peaq inherits shared security from the Relay Chain. This is a double-edged sword: strong security without maintaining your own validatorValidatorA computer that runs the full blockchain protocol, verifies transactions, and proposes new blocks. Validators are the workers that keep a Proof of Stake network running, and they earn rewards for doing the work correctly.Like a notary public who witnesses and stamps legal documents. Validators witness transactions, check they follow the rules, and stamp them into the permanent record. A notary who commits fraud loses their license. Validators work the same way, except the license is staked tokens that get slashed on misbehaviour.Validator in the glossary → set, but dependency on Polkadot’s health and the need to maintain a parachain slot. If Polkadot contracts, peaq’s security modelModelA trained neural network that takes inputs (text, images, audio) and produces outputs (more text, classifications, generated content). In DeAI the model is the thing that actually does the work.Like a very experienced apprentice who has spent years watching thousands of masters make furniture. They can't explain how they know when a joint is right, but they can make a chair that looks and functions like a Chippendale. The training is invisible. The output is what matters.Model in the glossary → is directly affected.
The broader question is whether the Machine Economy needs a specialised L1 at all, or whether general-purpose chains with smart contract-based machine identity will be good enough. peaq is betting on specialisation. The answer won’t be clear until autonomous machine transactions happen at scale. That’s still years away.
Tokenomics
PEAQ launched with a genesis supply of 4.2 billion tokens. There’s no maximum supply. The model is disinflationary, starting at 3.5% annual inflationInflationThe annual rate at which new tokens are created and added to the circulating supply. Most networks use inflation to pay validators, stakers, and infrastructure providers from freshly minted tokens rather than real revenue.Like a landlord who raises the rent every year. If your salary goes up at the same rate, you break even. If it doesn't, you get poorer without noticing, because the number on your payslip hasn't changed but the ground under it has shifted.Inflation in the glossary → and decreasing by 10% each year until it stabilises at 1% (approximately 12 years post-launch).
The scheduled rate for Year 2 is ~3.15%. peaq’s tokenomics documentation describes no burnBurnPermanently removing tokens from circulation by sending them to an address that no one controls. Burns reduce total supply, which (all else equal) makes each remaining token worth more of the network's value.Like a company buying back its own shares and shredding them. The company's total value stays the same, but each remaining share now represents a slightly bigger slice of that value.Burn in the glossary → of transaction fees, and issued supply read on chain sits within about a month’s emissions of that schedule, so dilution is running at the nominal rate. The VEO programme manages how early-investor tokens reach the market, which spreads sell pressure without reducing supply.
Funding totalled approximately $24.9 million across rounds: pre-seed (EUR 750K, October 2020), seed (EUR 2.5M, June 2021), second seed ($6M led by Fundamental Labs, June 2022), and Series A ($15M led by Generative Ventures and Borderless Capital, March 2024). Investors include Spartan Group, HV Capital, CMCC Global, Animoca Brands, and Moonrock Capital.
Distribution:
- Ecosystem & Treasury: 20% – 48-month linear vestingVestingA schedule that locks up tokens allocated to insiders, investors, and team members, releasing them gradually over months or years. Vesting prevents insiders from dumping on public buyers immediately after launch.Like a new employee's stock options at a startup. You don't get all the shares on day one. They unlock over four years so you stick around and do the work rather than cashing out and leaving.Vesting in the glossary →
- Community Initiatives: 15% – 36-month linear vesting
- Private Sale: 13% – 6-month cliffCliffA waiting period at the start of a token vesting schedule during which no tokens unlock at all. After the cliff ends, tokens begin releasing according to the vesting schedule.Like a probationary period at a new job. You don't get your stock options on day one. You wait 12 months to prove you'll stick around, then everything starts unlocking normally.Cliff in the glossary →, 18-month linear, 7.5% at unlock
- Core Team: 11.5% – 9-month cliff, 36-month linear
- EoT Labs: 8.5% – 9-month cliff, 36-month linear
- Pre-Seed: 7% – 6-month cliff, 24-month linear, 5% at unlock
- Launchpad/Community Sale: 6% – 6-month linear
- Seed: 5% – 6-month cliff, 24-month linear, 5% at unlock
- Network Security: 5% – 54-month linear (Polkadot coretime purchases)
Circulating supplyCirculating SupplyThe number of tokens currently in circulation and tradeable on the open market. Differs from total supply (which includes locked or unvested tokens) and max supply (the upper limit, if there is one).Like the number of cars on the road today versus the number ever produced. Some are in showrooms, some in junkyards, some still at the factory. Only the ones on the road count toward what people are actually driving.Circulating Supply in the glossary → is a little over half of the current ~4.44 billion total supply (grown from the 4.2 billion genesis via disinflationary emissions). The insider allocation (Core Team 11.5% + EoT Labs 8.5% + Pre-Seed 7% + Seed 5% + Private Sale 13% = 45%) is heavy.
Two things changed on the supply side in the window to 5 September 2026, both read from peaq’s own tokenomics documentation. The Economics 2.0 contracts went live on mainnet on 1 September: machines now activate on USD-priced subscription tiers and bond PEAQ at the oracle rate, and those bonds sit in the MachineSubscription contract and count as circulating supply. A lapsed bond decays over fourteen days, half to burn and half to treasury, except that peaq’s docs state the burn address in InfoDesk is unset, so the burn half reduces nothing today. Anyone describing peaq as burning PEAQ on lapsed bonds is describing intent.
The second is a consolidation rather than a mechanism. On 28 August the Community Reserve (186,354,098 PEAQ) and the Security Reserve (46,362,265 PEAQ) each sent their full balance to the Ecosystem and Treasury Reserve and are now empty, and a further 36,558,287 PEAQ left that reserve on 1 September against a stated purpose of “to be confirmed”. Two separately-labelled pools folding into the team-controlled one does not change the total, but it does concentrate roughly 845 million PEAQ, about a fifth of supply, behind a single label with one recent outflow the project has not yet explained. The block-reward change announced alongside it has since gone live: the chain runs runtime spec 113 on a 24 September 2026 read.
peaq’s docs describe the new split as 70% to the treasury and 30% to validators and delegators. The reward pallet’s Sinks storage, read on 24 September 2026, divides block rewards four ways:
- 30% to the staking pot for validators and delegators
- 30% to EVM contract
0x9e37…3895 - 20% to the treasury pallet (
py/trsry) - 20% to EVM contract
0x7088…e92a
The two EVM contracts take half of block rewards between them, and the docs’ 70/30 description doesn’t account for them.
Until spec 113 the split was 40% to validators and delegators, 25% to the General Treasury, 20% to the DePIN Incentive Pool, 10% to the Security Treasury (coretime) and 5% to the Machine Subsidisation Pool. The docs record that the DePIN Incentive Pool and the other legacy pools no longer receive block rewards.
The tokenTokenA digital unit of value or access rights tracked on a blockchain. Tokens can represent ownership in a project, a right to use a service, a share of future revenue, or simply a tradable asset with no underlying claim.Like a physical poker chip a casino issues. The chip itself has no value. What makes it worth something is what it lets you do at the casino, what the casino has promised, and how much other people will pay you for it.Token in the glossary → is down more than 90% from its all-time high of December 2024, a month after launch. Live price data is displayed above.
StakingStakingLocking up a cryptocurrency to help secure a blockchain network, usually in exchange for rewards. The locked tokens act as a security deposit that can be taken away if the staker misbehaves.Like putting down a large rental deposit for an apartment. You get the money back if you behave, you earn interest while it's locked, and the landlord takes it if you trash the place.Staking in the glossary → is DPoS/NPoS with APY ranging 5-15% depending on total staked. Slashing exists for validator misbehaviour.
Vested Emission Offerings (VEOs). In mid-2025, peaq launched a VEO programme through Lucid Finance’s platform. Early investors can offer portions of their vested tokens at a 12.5% discount to market price with a 3-month linear vesting schedule. Participating investors commit approximately 10% of proceeds as an in-kind contribution to the peaq Foundation, which channels these funds into MachineX (peaq’s DEXDEXDecentralised Exchange. A trading venue where token swaps happen entirely through smart contracts, with no central operator holding user funds. The largest DEXes are Uniswap, Aerodrome, Raydium, PancakeSwap, and Curve.Like a self-service vending machine that lets you swap one type of coin for another. The machine sets the exchange rate based on its current stock, anyone can deposit coins to refill it, and there's no clerk behind the counter.DEX in the glossary →) to strengthen on-chain liquidity. All transactions execute on-chain through smart contracts. No backroom deals. peaq reported that the programme sold out five VEOs worth $306,100 in its first month, with $500,000 in total vested PEAQ made available, and a second round of 2.8M+ tokens followed. This is a sensible mechanism: it gives early investors a structured exit route while preventing the sudden dumps that kill token prices, and it channels fresh liquidity into the network. Whether it materially affects sell pressure at scale remains to be seen.
Listed on Kraken, KuCoin, Gate.io, MEXC, Bitget, Crypto.com, Coinone and others. Binance carries no PEAQ spot pair against any quote asset as of 6 September 2026. Live price and volume data is displayed above.
How to participate
Stake PEAQ. Delegate tokens to validators via DPoS. 30% of block rewards go to validators and delegators under runtime spec 113. APY 5-15% depending on total staked. Slashing risk via validator selection. Technical skill: basic. Requires PEAQ tokens and a compatible wallet.
Run a validator. Operate a collator node (creates blocks) or delegator node (ensures finalisation via Polkadot Relay Chain). Substrate node operation. Technical skill: advanced. Server hardware required with uptime commitments.
Build a DePIN. Deploy EVM or WASM smart contracts and use native machine-economy modules. SDKs available in JavaScript, Python, and Rust. The DePIN Incentive Pool no longer receives block rewards under runtime spec 113; grants are available. Technical skill: advanced. This is the participation method that grows the network.
Honest assessment
What works. The engineering is solid and open: SDKs in three languages, audited core code, self-sovereign machine identities, and a published four-phase path to on-chain governance. peaq has also done the business development most DePIN chains skip, with enterprise names attached to pilots.
What doesn’t work yet. Monetisation. Usage figures are large and fees are tiny, and MachineX, the busiest application, earns more than the chain it runs on. Until fees or a burn start to offset emissions, the token’s returns rest on staking inflation, which pays holders in more of the same token.
Freedom Score: 52/100
peaq is a well-engineered open-source L1 but with centralised control dynamics and Polkadot dependency.
Infrastructure Decentralisation: 11/20. Polkadot parachain with DPoS/NPoS, secured by Relay Chain validators. peaq reports 49K TPS. Parachain dependency means peaq lacks independent sovereignty, and its liveness depends on maintaining a Polkadot slot. Enterprise focus suggests some centralisation in key relationships.
The collator set is small and concentrated: 31 candidates for 42 slots, so selection is uncontested, and 3 collators hold over a third of backing. The top ten held 74.8% of backing on a 24 September 2026 read, and collators had posted about 0.18% of the stake behind them, with the rest delegated. That measurement is why peaq’s claim to “the highest Nakamoto Coefficients” in the industry is graded inflated on the integrity board: it holds only for the Polkadot Relay Chain, which peaq doesn’t operate.
Governance Decentralisation: 9/20. peaq has published a four-phase governance roadmap: (1) Foundation era at genesis with pools dormant; (2) committee on-chain governanceDAODecentralised Autonomous Organisation. A way to coordinate decisions and manage a treasury using token-weighted voting instead of a traditional company structure. Token holders propose and vote on changes directly.Like a shareholder-run company where every shareholder can vote on every decision, the votes are public, and the company can't do anything the shareholders don't approve. The coordination is messier than a normal company but nobody has unilateral control.DAO in the glossary → via a six-member council operating within strict parametersParametersThe internal numbers (weights and biases) inside a neural network that get adjusted during training. A 70-billion-parameter model has 70 billion adjustable internal numbers encoding everything it has learned.Like the synapses in a human brain. Each parameter is a tiny dial that gets nudged a little during training. With enough dials, the network can represent surprisingly complex patterns. The total parameter count is roughly how much "brain" the model has.Parameters in the glossary → (current phase); (3) community committee inclusion where token holders gradually gain voting rights; (4) fully decentralised on-chain governance where PEAQ holders control proposals, voting, and parameter changes directly. The roadmap is credible and well-structured, but peaq is still in phase 2, a six-member council with undisclosed identities making decisions on behalf of the Foundation. The 45% insider allocation concentrates voting power. Score reflects current state, not the destination.
Token Distribution Fairness: 5/15. 45% insider allocation: Core Team 11.5% + EoT Labs 8.5% + Pre-Seed 7% + Seed 5% + Private Sale 13%. Community-accessible allocation is approximately 21% (Community Initiatives 15% + Launchpad 6%). Ecosystem & Treasury (20%) is team-controlled. Only 58% circulating after ~22 months.
Censorship Resistance: 8/15. Permissionless chain: anyone can deploy EVM or WASM contracts. Machine identities (DIDs) are self-sovereign. Polkadot shared security is a meaningful strength here. However, parachain dependency and enterprise integrations may introduce compliance requirements. No privacy features for machine data.
Data Sovereignty: 8/15. Self-sovereign machine identities (W3C DID compliant) and verifiable machine data storage are substantive sovereignty features. However, no privacy-preserving computation; data stored on-chain is visible. No encryption guarantees beyond what applications implement.
Open Source Transparency: 11/15. 100 public GitHub repos, 43 of them peaq’s own and the rest forks (GitHub API, 18 September 2026), with active development. Core chain is 98.3% Rust. CertiK audit scored 97.96/100. SRL audit completed. SDKs in JS, Python, Rust all open source. Good transparency. Score limited because SRL audit reports are not publicly readable from repos.
Returns Score: 46/100
Token Utility: 15/20. PEAQ is used for gasGasThe fee paid to a blockchain to process a transaction. Gas is denominated in the chain's native token and varies with network demand. Sending a transaction without enough gas means the transaction fails and the gas is still consumed.Like the petrol that powers a car. You need to put petrol in to make the engine run. The amount of petrol you need depends on how far you're driving and how much you're carrying. If you run out, the car stops.Gas in the glossary → fees, staking (DPoS/NPoS), governance, machine identity registration, and M2M payments. The token is structurally essential to the chain; 60+ DePINs use it for operations. Strong multi-utility design with broad on-chain usage.
Value Accrual: 9/20. Transaction fees paid in PEAQ (gas). 30% of block rewards go to validators and delegators under runtime spec 113 (40% before it), and the DePIN Incentive Pool no longer receives any. No fee distribution to non-staking holders. The VEO programme channels 10% of early investor exit proceeds into MachineX DEX liquidity, which is a modest but actual accrual mechanism.
The gas the chain collects is a rounding error against its own emissions: our own sampling of peaq’s EVM layer puts it at roughly 429.9 thousand PEAQ a year, and that is a floor rather than a total. Value accrual therefore rests on staking inflation, which pays holders in more of the same token rather than in anything the network earned.
Supply Dynamics: 9/20. No max supply. Inflation started at 3.5%, is scheduled at ~3.15% in Year 2, and trends toward 1% over 12 years. The earlier 10 leaned on a fee burn said to cut effective inflation to ~2.5%, and that burn has no source: peaq’s docs describe no fee burn and record the InfoDesk burn address as unset. So dilution runs at the scheduled rate.
58% circulating after ~22 months is reasonable progress, and insider vesting is documented with cliffs and linear schedules. The VEO programme through Lucid Finance manages early investor exits through discounted vested sales (12.5% discount, 3-month vesting) and channels 10% of proceeds into on-chain liquidity, though it leaves total supply unchanged. A little under half of supply remains locked or vesting.
Revenue Sustainability: 7/25. Reported usage is high: peaq counts 40.4 million transactions in Q3 2025, 60+ DePINs and 6M+ machines and people on-chain. Enterprise partnerships (NTT, Continental, Airbus, Bosch) suggest commercial traction. Monetisation is where it comes apart, and the fees divide into two layers that are worth keeping apart.
The chain earns roughly 429.9 thousand PEAQ a year in EVM gas, on our own count of every EVM block in a day, annualised: with traffic this bursty that is an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a precise figure, and it still rounds to nothing against emissions. Token Terminal, which sees the Substrate side our EVM read cannot, puts its chain fees near $19,000 for the trailing year. MachineX, the busiest application on peaq, is a better-looking number and it belongs to MachineX: about $268.1K a year at the current run-rate, down from a peak month of $166.4K in October 2025. Neither layer covers emissionsEmissionsNew tokens created and distributed by a blockchain protocol over time as rewards to validators, stakers, or miners. Emissions fund network security and participation at the cost of diluting existing holders.Like a company that pays employees partly in newly printed shares. Every year the total number of shares goes up, which means existing shareholders own a slightly smaller slice of the same company unless the company grows faster than the printing.Emissions in the glossary →, and the one that is growing is the token supply.
Liquidity & Access: 6/15. Listed on Kraken, KuCoin, Gate.io, MEXC, Bitget and Crypto.com, among others. Binance carries no PEAQ spot pair at all as of 6 September 2026, against any quote asset, so the main-spot listing this review has carried since January 2026 cannot be confirmed and is withdrawn. Depth is thin and evenly spread, with the largest venue near a seventh of the flow. Adequate for small-to-medium positions. Liquidity & Access +1 (to 7) was a candidate on the strength of that Binance listing and the July 2026 review denied it on thin, venue-concentrated post-listing turnover. With no Binance spot pair now visible, the candidate is closed on its premise as well as on its evidence.
PEAQ has also traded on Solana since 8 September 2026, per the Sunrise gateway’s asset list, through an SPL mint that peaq’s token page names and a single Raydium PEAQ/USDC pool on DexScreener. A read of that mint on 24 September 2026 found about 22.1M PEAQ, roughly 0.5% of issued supply, so the Solana leg is too small to move this score.
peaqOS reaches Solana as well: peaq’s documentation describes machines homed on Solana, with the identity and Machine NFT held as Solana accounts and the bond held on peaq. New Solana onboarding is paused for now. peaq’s own peaqOS assistant repository says an upgrade broke Solana onboarding in CLI 0.0.13 and sends operators to a peaq home instead (merged 1 October 2026).
Quadrant: D (Low Freedom, Low Returns)
peaq sits on the border of Quadrants B and D. The open-source infrastructure and DePIN thesis have sovereignty relevance, but the 45% insider allocation and Polkadot dependency, combined with minimal revenue, place it in Quadrant D. Technically interesting but not yet delivering on either sovereignty or returns.
Key risks
- Activity without monetisation. 60+ DePINs, millions of users, enterprise logos, and a chain that collects a rounding error in gas. The network is broad but not deep in commercial terms.
- Token collapse. Down more than 90% from its December 2024 ATHATHAll-Time High. The highest price a token has ever reached. ATH is usually quoted as a reference point for how far the current price has fallen (or risen) since the peak.Like the record lap time on a racetrack. It tells you what the car has been capable of at its absolute best, not what it will do today. Whether that record gets broken again depends on conditions that may or may not come back.ATH in the glossary →. CoinList and early investors are deeply underwater.
- Insider overhang. 45% allocated to team, entity, and investors with vesting still in progress. Significant sell pressure as tokens unlock.
- Polkadot dependency. As a parachain, peaq’s liveness depends on maintaining a Polkadot slot. Polkadot’s health directly affects peaq.
- Concentration risk. 6M+ on-chain users are dominated by Teneo alone. If a few large DePINs leave, the network metrics collapse.
- DePIN timing. The Machine Economy thesis is forward-looking. Autonomous machine transactions at scale are years away.
- L1 competition. Solana’s DePIN network is larger and more liquid. General-purpose L1s are adding DePIN capabilities.
Score change log
| Date | Score | Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Data | N/A | EVM gas index now counts every block in a day instead of sampling four windows, which had missed the bursts; the figure roughly tripled and the claim that most fees settle outside the EVM was dropped. Scores unchanged. |
| 2026-10-07 | Data | N/A | Added peaqOS on Solana as peaq documents it, with new Solana onboarding paused since an upgrade broke it, per peaq’s own repo. Scores unchanged. |
| 2026-10-04 | Data | N/A | Removed the claim that peaq still runs the krest canary network: peaq’s node repo deleted the krest runtime on 7 Sep 2026 (PR #397), calling the network decommissioned, and its RPC no longer answers. Scores unchanged. |
| 2026-09-27 | Editorial | N/A | Added a review verdict up top and filled the empty Honest assessment section; new seoTitle and description. No score change. |
| 2026-09-25 | Score | Freedom 53 → 52, Returns 47 → 46 (D held) | Infrastructure 12 → 11: 33 collators for 42 slots, the top ten at 74.8%, four holding a third. Supply Dynamics 10 → 9: the burn behind the old ~2.5% inflation has no source, so dilution runs at the scheduled ~3.15%. |
| 2026-09-24 | Data | N/A | Runtime spec 113 is live: block rewards now pay 30% to staking (was 40%), per an on-chain read of the reward sinks. The ~2.5% “effective inflation with burn” had no source; peaq’s docs describe no fee burn, so Year 2 is shown at the scheduled ~3.15%. Collator-set, repo-count, ATH and self-reported usage lines re-sourced. Scores unchanged. |
| 2026-09-24 | Data | N/A | robotic.sh additions noted: an Allora adapter (free keyless reads, operator-paid worker registration) and World ID, listed as operator-configured Setup. Scores unchanged. |
| 2026-09-24 | Data | N/A | Solana venue added via the Sunrise gateway (8 Sep 2026): about 22.1M PEAQ on the Solana mint, roughly 0.5% of issued supply, in one Raydium pool. Liquidity & Access 6/15 held. |
| 2026-09-23 | Data | N/A | Integrity records re-cut: 3 claims now quote peaq’s own pages verbatim and 7 are our own measurements. Scores unchanged. |
| 2026-09-07 | Data | N/A | WS3b supply rail: issued supply read on chain (Balances.TotalIssuance) sits above the 4.2B our tokenomics carried, which was the genesis figure. peaq has no max supply, so a percentage quoted against genesis drifts upward on its own. 28.35% of issued supply is bonded. Supply Dynamics 10/20 held. |
| 2026-09-07 | Data | N/A | WS3b consensus rail: collator selection is uncontested, with fewer candidates than slots, so entry is genuinely open and there is no competitive pressure or spare capacity. Collators post a fraction of a percent of stake; the rest is delegated. Censorship 8/15 held. |
| 2026-09-06 | Data | N/A | Research JSON resynced to the frontmatter Returns breakdown. Revenue Sustainability 8 predates the 2026-09-05 move to 7, and Supply Dynamics 9 predates a March 2026 move to 10 that no log row names. No published score changed. |
| 2026-09-06 | Data | N/A | WS3b liquidity rail: Binance carries no PEAQ spot pair against any quote asset, so the main-spot listing asserted since January 2026 is withdrawn from all three surfaces; whether it was ever listed and later removed was not established. The other six venues confirm. Liquidity & Access 6/15 held. |
| 2026-09-05 | Data | N/A | Economics 2.0 live on mainnet 1 Sep 2026 (machine bonds in MachineSubscription, counted as circulating), with peaq’s own docs recording the InfoDesk burn address as unset, so the lapsed-bond burn reduces nothing yet. The 70/30 block-reward split is merged but awaits spec 113. Token Utility +1 candidate deferred to October: four days is too little to score. |
| 2026-09-05 | Data | N/A | Community Reserve (186,354,098 PEAQ) and Security Reserve (46,362,265 PEAQ) emptied into the Ecosystem and Treasury Reserve on 28 Aug 2026, with 36,558,287 PEAQ leaving it on 1 Sep against an unstated purpose. Total unchanged; concentration behind one team-controlled label is the Token Distribution Fairness question, flagged for October. |
| 2026-09-05 | Returns | Revenue Sustainability 8 → 7 (Returns 48 → 47, D held) | Executes the decision of 2026-08-17. The dimension rested on “$163.6K annualised fees, per DeFiLlama”, which Token Terminal put nearer $19K for the trailing year, so the move is what an ~8x overstatement is worth within an unchanged band. Circulating also refreshed ~50% to ~56%. |
| 2026-08-17 | Data | N/A | Estimator corrected. The EVM gas index stored the median of sampled window rates; fees are a flow, so the unbiased estimator is the mean, and the median understated by up to 4x by discarding the bursts that carry the volume. Figure re-read and qualified as an order of magnitude. |
| 2026-08-17 | Data | N/A | Token Terminal recovered: chain fees read ~$100K all-time and ~$19K over the trailing year, peaking near $19.7K a month in March 2025. Our EVM sampling is ~6% of that, which sizes the Substrate leg it cannot see at ~94% of fees. DeFiLlama’s adapter is the outlier by three orders of magnitude. Score flagged for September. |
| 2026-08-17 | Data | N/A | Chain fees graded unverifiable. A direct read of peaq’s own EVM RPC measured $1.70-$10.40 a day in gas, against the $0.01 a day DeFiLlama reports, so the one refreshable source undercounts by roughly two orders of magnitude. The measured figure is itself only a floor, since it cannot see Substrate-side DePIN traffic. |
| 2026-08-17 | Data | N/A | The “$163.6K annualised fees, per DeFiLlama” figure is retired. It conflated two layers: gas paid to peaq, and fees earned by MachineX, a DEX built on peaq. They are now reported separately and bound to a live index. Scores unchanged pending the September review. |
| 2026-08-12 | Data | N/A | WS3 open-source verdict added (1->2). peaq-network-node (Substrate parachain) is Apache-2.0, 100-repo org, active (match). Independent supply read deferred: native PEAQ needs a Subscan key or raw Substrate decode. Scores unchanged. |
| 2026-07-01 | Data | N/A | July monthly review resolves the deferred Liquidity & Access +1 (Binance listing) candidate: DENIED and closed. Post-listing turnover did not sustain: 24h volume ~$1.1M and BitMart-concentrated (CoinGecko 2026-07-01), no Binance pair leading current liquidity. Held at 6/15, no score change. |
| 2026-06-02 | Data | N/A | June monthly review. Circulating refreshed 1.86B (44.3% of genesis) → ~2.21B (~50% of the current ~4.41B total) per CoinGecko, reflecting continued disinflationary emissions and unlocks; denominator switched from genesis-4.2B to current-total for accuracy. “No max supply” unchanged (CoinGecko’s listed max ~5.67B is a projection artifact). Score unchanged. Next unlock ~12 June 2026 (~1.9%). Liquidity & Access +1 (Binance listing) still held pending post-listing volume. |
| ------ | ------- | -------- | -------- |
| 2026-08-15 | Data | N/A | Circulating supply de-hardcoded and bound. The stated ~50% was 4.4pp stale against 54.44% of total supply. |
| 2026-05-27 | Editorial | N/A | Initial Machine Offerings (IMOs) launched via CoinList on 14 May 2026, framework for tokenising physical machines (robots, sensors, vehicles) as RWAs through peaqOS. Liquidity & Access score adjustment already flagged for June review (2026-05-03 row, candidate 6→7); IMO partnership doesn’t move the dial on the broader $163.6K annualised fees gap. No score change. |
| 2026-05-03 | Editorial | N/A | Binance main spot listing (January 2026) corrected; article previously said “Binance Alpha only”. Liquidity & Access score adjustment (6 to 7 candidate) deferred to June review. |
| 2026-04-06 | Data | N/A | Quarterly review. Inflation updated from ~3.15% to ~2.5% effective (burn mechanism). Governance roadmap and VEO already reflected. Verified against primary sources. Scores unchanged. |
| 2026-03-12 | Both | N/A | March 2026 refresh. VEO programme added, Q3 2025 transaction data updated. Scores unchanged. |
| 2025-03-06 | Both | N/A | Initial publish. Freedom 50/100, Returns 48/100. |
Team overview
Tech startup background, introduced co-founders to blockchain in 2015 in Berlin.
Entered blockchain in Berlin's early crypto community circa 2015. Previously delivered blockchain solutions for Audi.
Built Advanced Blockchain AG, the first blockchain development company listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Graduated from MCAST (Malta).
| Round | Amount | Date | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Seed | $850K | 2020-10-01 | Werner Geissler (ex-P&G VP), Michael Ganser (ex-Cisco Germany CEO) |
| Seed | $2.8M | 2021-06-01 | Scherzer & Co. AG |
| Seed | $6.0M | 2022-06-01 | Fundamental Labs |
| Series A | $15.0M | 2024-03-01 | Generative Ventures, Borderless Capital |
Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-10-19
Technical snapshot
Substrate-based Layer-1 blockchain running as a Polkadot parachain. Dual smart contract support: EVM (Solidity) and WASM (Rust/ink!). Native machine-economy modules built into the chain: peaq ID (machine identity), peaq access (RBAC), peaq verify (data verification), peaq store (key-value storage), peaq pay (M2M payments), UMT (time sync). 49K TPS achieved in Q3 2025 with target of 100K+ TPS.
Commit Activity
Community
Audits
Scope: Core chain pallets (DID, MOR, RBAC, Transaction, Storage)
Score 97.96/100 on foundational health. 35 findings: 0 critical, 4 major, 9 medium, 8 minor, 14 informational. Ranked #1 on CertiK Skynet for pre-launch projects.
View reportScope: peaq-network-node (Substrate/Rust chain implementation)
Audit completed. Full report not publicly readable from GitHub repos.
View reportSource: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-10-19
Tokenomics deep dive
Token utility
- Gas fees for transactions on peaq L1
- Staking for network security (DPoS/NPoS validators and delegators)
- Governance participation
- Machine identity registration and management
- M2M payment currency
- DePIN incentive distribution
Supply
| Max supply | Total supply | Circulating | Circ. % |
|---|---|---|---|
| -- | 4,441,653,521 | 2,214,921,216 | 50.2% |
Allocation
Method: Private rounds + CoinList ICO + community airdrops + staking emissions
| Category | % | Vesting | Cliff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecosystem & Treasury | 20% | 48 months linear | None |
| Community Initiatives | 15% | 36 months linear | None |
| Private Sale | 13% | 18 months linear, 7.5% at unlock | 6 months |
| Core Team | 11.5% | 36 months linear | 9 months |
| EoT Labs | 8.5% | 36 months linear | 9 months |
| Pre-Seed | 7% | 24 months linear, 5% at unlock | 6 months |
| Launchpad/Community Sale | 6% | 6 months linear | None |
| Seed | 5% | 24 months linear, 5% at unlock | 6 months |
| Network Security | 5% | 54 months linear | None |
| Advisors | 9% | Not documented separately | Not documented |
Emissions
Vesting timeline
Community unlock
Private Sale cliff
Pre-Seed cliff
Seed cliff
Core Team cliff
EoT Labs cliff
Inflation decreases 10% annually until reaching 1% (~12 years post-launch)
Staking
Genesis supply of 4.2B with no max supply. 44.3% circulating. Insider allocation (Core Team 11.5% + EoT Labs 8.5% + Pre-Seed 7% + Seed 5% + Private Sale 13% = 45%) is significant. Inflation model is well-structured — 3.5% decreasing 10% annually to 1%. 40% of inflation goes to validators/delegators. Token down 98% from ATH. FDV of $64.7M is reasonable relative to $24.9M raised but investors from higher-priced rounds may be significantly underwater.
Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-10-19
PEAQ Supply Simulator
Scenario Parameters
Circulating Supply Projection
Monthly Emissions vs Burns
Revenue vs Emission Value
Supply projections only. Token price held constant at $0.0363 (snapshot 19 Oct 2026). No burn mechanism. This is not financial advice.
Participation at a glance
Delegate PEAQ tokens to validators to secure the network. Earn staking rewards from inflation distribution (40% of inflation goes to validators/delegators).
Run a collator or validator node on the peaq network. Collators create blocks; validators ensure finalisation via Polkadot Relay Chain.
Build DePIN applications on peaq using native machine-economy modules (peaq ID, access, verify, store, pay) and EVM/WASM smart contracts. SDKs available in JavaScript, Python, and Rust.
Developer resources
Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-10-19
Usage and traction
Data from: DeFiLlama for TVL and fees. peaq Machine Economy Report Q3 2025 for transaction counts. (2026-10-07) . Cards dated separately are live readings (DeFiLlama chain TVL, chain consensus API).
Research note, 2026-10-07: 60+ DePINs across 22 industries building on peaq. 6M+ people and machines on-chain (primarily via Teneo with 6M+ community nodes). 40.4M transactions in Q3 2025. TVL is low ($726K) because DeFi is not the primary use case — peaq is infrastructure for machine economy, not trading. Enterprise partnerships include NTT, Continental, Airbus, Mastercard, Bosch, Gaia. Real usage exists but monetisation is minimal — $163.6K annualised fees. Revenue card emptied 2026-10-07: the chain take is measured in PEAQ by our own index and shown in prose through the peaq-fees source; there is no like-for-like USD figure.
Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-10-19
Community
Governance
On-chain governance via Substrate governance module. Token holders can propose and vote on protocol changes.
Sentiment
Active community with strong DePIN narrative. 60+ projects building on the chain creates ecosystem momentum. Enterprise partnerships (NTT, Continental, Airbus, Bosch) add credibility. Token price decline (98% from ATH) is a concern but the team continues shipping.
Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-10-19
Sources consulted (20)
Read next
Project review
IoTeX
EVM-compatible L1 purpose-built for DePIN and real-world AI. Device identity (ioID), ZK-verified data (W3bstream), 7+ years mainnet. MiCA-compliant, CF Benchmarks listed. ~$2M TVL.
Project review
Auki Review
Hong Kong spatial-computing DePIN with one externally documented retail pilot and an admitted-centralisation posemesh. Daily linear vesting is the cleanest piece. Reconstruction node network in closed beta. The 40,000-stores headline that surfaced in DeAI triage is wrong.
Project review
Ora Protocol
The verifiable AI oracle stopped answering in September 2025 and the team repointed the Ora name at an AI trading-fund product that does not use the token. The contract is immutable and admin-free. Nothing else is running.