active compute AKT
Akash Network logo

Akash Network

Independent Akash Network review with on-chain verified revenue, real customer analysis, and dual freedom/returns scoring. Updated monthly.

A
Quadrant
Best of both
66
Freedom
/100
C
68
Returns
/100
C
Verdict · Sovereignty and returns

The most credible decentralised cloud marketplace operating today. Real revenue, real customers, BME burn now live. Chain migration still looming.

Strengths
  • + Longest-running decentralised cloud marketplace with real customers and 128% YoY growth
  • + Fully open source under Apache 2.0 across 65 repos and 350+ contributors
  • + Founder Osuri testified before US Congress on AI energy in May 2025
Risks
  • Chain migration announced by founder, not governance-voted, with no published spec
  • No formal protocol-level security audit disclosed in five years of production
  • Revenue-to-emission ratio below 0.5; still emission-heavy at current scale
Freedom Score
C66/100?

Akash scores a C (66/100), reflecting genuine infrastructure decentralisation with functional governance and exemplary open-source practices. The permissionless provider model and active on-chain governance (300+ proposals, community rejecting proposals for transparency) are strong points. Open-source transparency is near-exemplary at 13/15.

However, the small and declining provider set, insider-heavy genesis distribution, upcoming chain migration uncertainty, Starcluster centralisation vectors, and US jurisdiction of Overclock Labs prevent a higher score. The absence of a formal security audit for 5+ year production infrastructure is a material gap. If Akash successfully executes chain migration, activates BME, and grows provider diversity via Homenode, the score would improve materially.

Infrastructure decentralisation
12/20
Evidence
Active validators and provider counts tracked live via Akash Console API and Cosmos REST API. Permissionless provider onboarding -- anyone with qualifying hardware can join. GPUs deployed across independent providers. Geographic distribution is real. However: provider count is objectively thin for a 'cloud marketplace' and declined through 2025. Starcluster/Starbonds introduces centralisation: protocol-owned compute at enterprise datacentres with 'vetted Nodekeepers'. Homenode (Feb 2026 beta) is a decentralising force but very early. Chain migration to potentially Solana introduces uncertainty about future validator model. Overclock Labs remains the dominant development entity.
Governance decentralisation
13/20
Evidence
300+ on-chain governance proposals with active participation. Proposal #308 had 42.31% turnout, exceeding 33.4% quorum. 8 proposals passed in Q1 2025 alone. Community rejected Proposal #302 (Akash Adoption Lab) for lack of transparency -- governance has real teeth. 50% community pool tax funds community-directed spending. However: Overclock Labs drives the strategic roadmap. Chain migration was announced by founder, not governance-voted. Greg Osuri is the primary public voice and decision-maker on major strategic direction. Starbonds appears to be a company decision, not community-governed.
Token distribution fairness
8/15
Evidence
Genesis: 34.5% investors, 27% team -- heavily insider-weighted at launch. Long-term: 70.94% of max supply goes to mining/block rewards -- good. All tokens fully vested/unlocked -- no future dilution cliffs. Very modest fundraise ($4.1M total, with IEO component of only $800K). IEO was small with reasonable pricing ($0.3773-$0.7673). Current price (-96% from ATH) means many original investors have lost significantly. Not a fair launch, but the modest fundraise and majority mining allocation are above average.
Censorship resistance
10/15
Evidence
Permissionless provider and tenant participation. No KYC required to deploy or provide. Venice.ai integration demonstrates privacy-preserving compute. Reverse auction is on-chain and transparent. However: Starbonds/Starcluster introduces 'vetted' Nodekeepers -- potential censorship vector at the enterprise GPU layer. Overclock Labs is US-incorporated (Delaware) -- susceptible to US regulatory pressure. Spam attack (March 2025) showed network can be disrupted temporarily. Chain migration adds uncertainty about future censorship properties.
Data sovereignty
10/15
Evidence
Workloads run on provider hardware -- tenants control their deployment configurations and data. No central data collection by Akash protocol. SDL-based deployment gives users full control over infrastructure choices. Self-custodial Cosmos wallets (Keplr/Leap). Provider auditing (Moultrie) does not inspect tenant data. Homenode allows users to control their own hardware. However: providers physically host workloads and could theoretically inspect container contents. No encryption at compute layer. No zero-knowledge or confidential computing. ChainLight vulnerability (patched) showed potential for unauthorised deployment access. AkashML managed inference adds convenience but reduces sovereignty (managed service with centralised API).
Open source transparency
13/15
Evidence
Fully open source under Apache 2.0 licence across 65 repositories. Active development with real commits (Mainnet 14 was a massive Cosmos SDK v0.45 to v0.53 migration). All governance proposals public on GitHub. Quarterly reports published via Messari and internal blog. On-chain governance is transparent and verifiable. Revenue and provider metrics publicly accessible. Community development funded from community pool (50% of inflation). Build process uses standard Go toolchain. However: no formal protocol-level security audit despite 5+ years of operation. Overclock Labs' corporate financials not public. Starbonds introduces a new opaque financial dimension.
Returns Score
C 68/100 ?

Overall returns potential is moderate at 68/100. Strongest dimension: token utility (16/20). Weakest: revenue sustainability (14/25).

Token utility
16/20
Evidence
Payment for compute, staking for governance/security, validator requirement.
Value accrual
14/20
Evidence
Take rate on compute fees. BME live since 23 March 2026, burning ~5,500 AKT/day net. Vault holds ~380K AKT at ~2.4 collateral ratio. Still early but a functioning burn mechanism tied to real revenue.
Supply dynamics
14/20
Evidence
Uncapped supply with 8% nominal inflation, reduced to ~7.1% effective by BME burns at current usage. All vesting complete. Deflationary only if revenue scales significantly.
Revenue sustainability
14/25
Evidence
Real customers (Venice, ElizaOS, Morpheus, Gensyn). $3.15M annual revenue growing 128% YoY. But revenue-to-emission ratio below 0.5. Still emission-heavy.
Liquidity & access
10/15
Evidence
Coinbase, Kraken, KuCoin. No Binance. Moderate liquidity; adequate for mid-size positions.
Quadrant A — Best of both ?
Price
$0.507
Market Cap
$148.3M
FDV
$148.7M
24h Change
+5.1%
+5.1%
OYM holds AKT. This review reflects genuine assessment, not promotional interest.

Not financial advice. Scores are opinions, not recommendations. Crypto is high-risk – you could lose everything you invest. Full disclaimer.

Token Details
AKTCosmos SDK v0.53 + CometBFT (Mainnet 14, October 2025)
· Updated
On this page
Listen to this episode

What it does

Akash is a decentralised cloud computing marketplace built on a Cosmos SDKSDKSoftware Development Kit. A collection of code libraries, documentation, and tools that lets developers integrate a service into their applications without writing everything from scratch. SDKs are how projects become easy to build with.Like a plug-and-play kit for building furniture. You don't have to mill your own wood, forge your own screws, or design the joinery from scratch. The kit gives you pre-cut parts and instructions so you can assemble the thing in an afternoon.Read more → appchain. Providers list spare GPUGPUGraphics Processing Unit. Originally designed to render video game graphics, GPUs turned out to be exceptionally good at the massively parallel math that AI models need. Modern AI training and inference runs almost entirely on GPUs.Like a factory with 10,000 workers doing the same simple task in parallel, versus a CPU which is more like 10 workers each doing different complex tasks. AI training involves doing simple math a million times per second on a million numbers, which is exactly what the GPU factory is designed for.Read more →, CPU, memory and storage capacity. Tenants describe workloads in SDL (a YAML-based Stack Definition Language), submit deployment orders on-chain, and providers bid via reverse auction. Lowest qualifying bid wins. Workloads run in Kubernetes containers on provider hardware.

The chain handles order matching, escrow payments and provider attestationAttestationA cryptographic proof that a piece of code is running on a specific hardware enclave in an unmodified state. Attestation lets remote users verify that a service is genuinely running what it claims to be running.Like a tamper-evident seal on a medicine bottle. The seal itself doesn't make the medicine safe, but it gives you a way to verify that nobody opened the bottle and swapped the contents before you bought it.Read more →. Actual compute happens off-chain. GPU marketplace launched in September 2023 with NVIDIA support. AkashML managed inferenceInferenceRunning a trained AI model to produce an answer. Inference is what happens when you type a prompt into ChatGPT and get a response. The model takes your input, computes a best guess, and returns it.Like asking an expert for their opinion. The training was the decades they spent becoming an expert. The inference is the 30 seconds it takes them to answer your specific question.Read more → service followed, simplifying AI modelModelA trained neural network that takes inputs (text, images, audio) and produces outputs (more text, classifications, generated content). In DeAI the model is the thing that actually does the work.Like a very experienced apprentice who has spent years watching thousands of masters make furniture. They can't explain how they know when a joint is right, but they can make a chair that looks and functions like a Chippendale. The training is invisible. The output is what matters.Read more → deployment for tenants who don’t want to wrangle Kubernetes themselves.

Founded by Greg Osuri and Adam Bozanich through Overclock Labs, a Delaware-incorporated company (June 2015). Osuri founded AngelHack, a major hackathon organisation (160,000-plus developers per AngelHack’s site), and has over 10,000 GitHub contributions. He testified before the US Congress House Committee on AI energy in May 2025, one of the few decentralised cloud founders to do so. The team has grown to roughly 115 people. Mainnet has been running since September 2020, making Akash one of the longest-running decentralised cloud marketplaces in the space.

Value proposition

Cheaper than hyperscalers

50-85% cheaper than AWS, GCP and Azure. Reverse auction drives prices down because providers compete for your deployment.

Permissionless supply

Anyone with qualifying hardware can become a provider. No approval process, no relationship required.

Real customers, real revenue

$3.15M annual revenue from named customers (Venice, ElizaOS, Morpheus, Gensyn), up 128% year-over-year.

Cost. Akash compute runs 50-85% cheaper than AWS, GCP and Azure for comparable workloads. The reverse auction model drives prices down because providers compete for your deployment rather than you accepting a posted rate.

Permissionless supply is the structural differentiator. Anyone with qualifying hardware can become a provider. No approval process, no relationship required, no geographic restrictions. This is the opposite of how Render operates, where node operators need Foundation approval.

For the sovereignty thesis, the value is clear: you deploy containerised workloads on infrastructure that no single entity controls, pay with a self-custodial walletWalletSoftware that stores the private keys needed to control tokens on a blockchain. A wallet does not actually hold any tokens. The tokens live on the chain. The wallet holds the keys that prove you own them.Like the key to a safe deposit box. The key doesn't contain your valuables. The valuables sit in the bank's vault. The key is what proves you're allowed to open the box and take them.Read more →, and no platform collects data about what you are running. Venice uses Akash GPUs for its inference workloads. Morpheus routes compute through Akash providers. ElizaOS runs AI agents on the network. These are real customers generating real revenue, not testnet experiments.

The counter-narrative is scale. Akash has a small pool of active providers (see live count above) with a few hundred GPUs. AWS has millions. The “decentralised AWS” framing is aspirational. The reality is a functional but small marketplace that serves a specific niche: developers and projects that value permissionless deployment over managed services. GPU utilisation sits at roughly 60% (Akash’s own figure), which suggests credible demand but the absolute base is tiny. Provider count declined through 2025, despite usage growth. Homenode, launched in beta in February 2026, aims to reverse this by letting consumer hardware (RTX 4090/5090 minimum in Phase 1) participate, but adoption metrics are not yet available.

Tokenomics

AKT launched via IEO on BitMax (now AscendEX) in October 2020 at $0.38-$0.77 per tokenTokenA digital unit of value or access rights tracked on a blockchain. Tokens can represent ownership in a project, a right to use a service, a share of future revenue, or simply a tradable asset with no underlying claim.Like a physical poker chip a casino issues. The chip itself has no value. What makes it worth something is what it lets you do at the casino, what the casino has promised, and how much other people will pay you for it.Read more →. Total raise across all rounds: $4.1 million ($1.31 million seed from CrunchFund in 2017, $2 million private sale in 2019, roughly $800,000 IEO). By crypto standards, this is tiny, and that matters. Low funding means less VCVCVenture Capital. Private investors who fund projects at an early stage in exchange for equity or token allocations. VC rounds are typically pre-launch, at steep discounts to any future public price, with multi-year vesting.Like angel investors in a startup who buy shares before the company goes public. They take more risk because the company might fail, so they get a better price. Once the company IPOs they can sell, and the public market pays whatever price it thinks is fair.Read more → overhang, less misaligned incentive, and less pressure to juice metrics for investor returns.

Genesis supply was 100 million AKT. Long-term distribution of max supply:

  • MiningProof of WorkThe original blockchain consensus mechanism where miners compete to solve computationally expensive puzzles. The winner proposes the next block and earns the rewards. Proof of Work secures Bitcoin and most pre-2020 chains.Like a lottery that runs every 10 minutes where the tickets cost electricity. Whoever spends the most electricity buying lottery tickets has the best chance of winning that round's prize. Nobody can fake the result because the proof of their work is verifiable by everyone.Read more → (block rewardsEmissionsNew tokens created and distributed by a blockchain protocol over time as rewards to validators, stakers, or miners. Emissions fund network security and participation at the cost of diluting existing holders.Like a company that pays employees partly in newly printed shares. Every year the total number of shares goes up, which means existing shareholders own a slightly smaller slice of the same company unless the company grows faster than the printing.Read more →): 70.94%
  • Investors: 10.03% (1-year lock, graded release, fully vested)
  • Team and advisors: 7.85% (1-year lock, graduated release, fully vested)
  • Foundation: 5.72% (fully vested)
  • Ecosystem: 2.32%
  • Testnets: 1.45%
  • Vendors and marketing: 1.16%
  • Public sale (IEO): 0.52%

Current supply sits at roughly 290 million AKT against a genesis cap of 388.5 million. Circulating supplyCirculating SupplyThe number of tokens currently in circulation and tradeable on the open market. Differs from total supply (which includes locked or unvested tokens) and max supply (the upper limit, if there is one).Like the number of cars on the road today versus the number ever produced. Some are in showrooms, some in junkyards, some still at the factory. Only the ones on the road count toward what people are actually driving.Read more → is 283 million (74% of cap). All initial allocations are now fully vested. InflationInflationThe annual rate at which new tokens are created and added to the circulating supply. Most networks use inflation to pay validators, stakers, and infrastructure providers from freshly minted tokens rather than real revenue.Like a landlord who raises the rent every year. If your salary goes up at the same rate, you break even. If it doesn't, you get poorer without noticing, because the number on your payslip hasn't changed but the ground under it has shifted.Read more → runs at a maximum of 8% annually (reduced from the original schedule by Proposal 283 in March 2025), with a 50% community pool tax meaning half of all inflation goes to community-directed spending.

The tokenomics thesis hinges on BME (Burn-Mint EquilibriumBurn-Mint EquilibriumA tokenomics model where network fees burn tokens while new tokens are minted and paid to suppliers. The system tries to balance burns and mints so circulating supply stays roughly stable when usage scales.Like a business that spends a dollar of revenue for every dollar of wages it pays. Money flows in and out at the same rate, so the total cash in the company stays flat. The rate of flow tells you how big the business is.Read more →), which went live on 23 March 2026. AKT spent on compute gets burned and new AKT minted to providers. If compute spend exceeds inflation, the token becomes deflationary. On-chain data in the first week shows a 7-day average net burnBurnPermanently removing tokens from circulation by sending them to an address that no one controls. Burns reduce total supply, which (all else equal) makes each remaining token worth more of the network's value.Like a company buying back its own shares and shredding them. The company's total value stays the same, but each remaining share now represents a slightly bigger slice of that value.Read more → of roughly 5,500-6,200 AKT per day, with the BME vault holding approximately 380,000 AKT at a collateral ratio of around 2.4. At current usage (~$1.05 million annualised from Console APIAPIApplication Programming Interface. A structured way for one piece of software to talk to another. In DeAI, APIs let applications request inference from a model without running the model themselves.Like a waiter in a restaurant. You don't walk into the kitchen and cook your own meal. You tell the waiter what you want, they tell the kitchen, the kitchen cooks it, and the waiter brings it back. The API is the waiter.Read more → data), BME reduces effective inflation from 8% to roughly 7.1%. That’s a start, not a revolution. The gap between modest burn and meaningful deflation is the core investment question.

StakingStakingLocking up a cryptocurrency to help secure a blockchain network, usually in exchange for rewards. The locked tokens act as a security deposit that can be taken away if the staker misbehaves.Like putting down a large rental deposit for an apartment. You get the money back if you behave, you earn interest while it's locked, and the landlord takes it if you trash the place.Read more → yields roughly 7.3% APY nominal, which is approximately -0.7% to 0% real yield after accounting for 8% inflation and the 50% community pool tax. The 21-day unbonding period locks capital during volatile markets. Slashing risk exists: 5% for double-signing, 0.01% for prolonged downtime.

Starbonds, a $75 million securities offering (Reg A+ filing) announced in 2025, is the elephant in the room. This is a corporate fundraise by Overclock Labs. Terms are not yet fully public. Whatever the structure, it represents significant new capital flowing into the entity that controls the development roadmap, and introduces an opaque financial dimension alongside the transparent on-chain economics.

AKT is down 96% from the all-time high of $8.08 from April 2021. Listed on Coinbase, Kraken and KuCoin but notably absent from Binance, which limits Asian market liquidityLiquidityHow easily a token can be bought or sold without moving the price. High liquidity means you can enter or exit large positions quickly at the quoted price. Low liquidity means even small trades can swing the market.Like the difference between selling a house and selling a share of Apple stock. The house might be worth more on paper, but finding a buyer at that price takes weeks. The Apple share converts to cash in one click.Read more → and retail discovery. Grayscale added AKT to its AI Tools and Resources sector index in May 2025, and Coinbase included AKT in the Coinbase 50 Index in June 2025. See live data above for current pricing.

How to participate

Beginner
Stake AKT
Intermediate
Deploy workloads
Advanced
Provide compute

Stake AKT. Delegate to validators on the Akash chain. Earn inflation rewards (~7.3% APY nominal, near zero real yield after inflation and community pool tax). Vote on governance proposals through your validatorValidatorA computer that runs the full blockchain protocol, verifies transactions, and proposes new blocks. Validators are the workers that keep a Proof of Stake network running, and they earn rewards for doing the work correctly.Like a notary public who witnesses and stamps legal documents. Validators witness transactions, check they follow the rules, and stamp them into the permanent record. A notary who commits fraud loses their license. Validators work the same way, except the license is staked tokens that get slashed on misbehaviour.Read more → or directly. Requires a Cosmos wallet (Keplr). Minimum stake is negligible. The main consideration is the 21-day unbonding period.

Provide compute. Run a provider node and list spare capacity on the marketplace. Permissionless, anyone with qualifying hardware can join. Requires server-grade hardware, Kubernetes administration skills, NVIDIA GPUs for GPU workloads, and reliable internet. This is the more interesting participation mode if you have idle hardware, but the technical barrier is real.

Deploy workloads. Use Akash as a tenant. Describe your workload in SDL, submit to the marketplace, and providers bid. Typically 50-85% cheaper than centralised cloud. Requires Docker/container knowledge and an AKT deposit for escrow. No managed services (databases, load balancers, CDN), just raw compute.

Build. Four funding mechanisms: Community Pool (on-chain treasury), Akash Accelerate (grants programme), Akash Bounties Board and AkashML partnerships. Go and Kubernetes expertise preferred.

Honest assessment

What works

Akash is the most credible decentralised cloud marketplace operating today. That’s a factual statement, not an endorsement.

Akash’s quarterly Messari reports show $3.15 million in annual revenue (up 128% year-over-year), with 3.1 million deployments created in 2025 (466% growth). Venice, ElizaOS, Morpheus and Gensyn are verifiable, named customers deploying real workloads. Not testnet experiments, not sponsored integrations. The permissionless provider model is structurally sound: anyone with qualifying hardware can join. Fully open source under Apache 2.0 across 65 repositories with 350-plus contributors.

Osuri’s background (AngelHack founder, congressional testimony on AI energy) gives the project genuine credibility, not just marketing credibility. Listed on Coinbase and Kraken. Cosmos-based on-chain governanceDAODecentralised Autonomous Organisation. A way to coordinate decisions and manage a treasury using token-weighted voting instead of a traditional company structure. Token holders propose and vote on changes directly.Like a shareholder-run company where every shareholder can vote on every decision, the votes are public, and the company can't do anything the shareholders don't approve. The coordination is messier than a normal company but nobody has unilateral control.Read more → with real participation: 300-plus proposals, and the community rejected Proposal #302 for lack of transparency, showing governance has actual teeth. Homenode (beta February 2026) could expand the provider base by making consumer hardware eligible.

What doesn’t work yet

The active provider count isn’t a cloud marketplace. It’s a pilot programme, and the count declined through 2025 despite usage growth. Provider concentration means a handful of large operators serve the majority of capacity. No managed services limits enterprise adoption to teams comfortable with raw compute. Revenue growth of 128% sounds impressive until you realise it went from $1.4 million to $3.15 million, which is not meaningful at infrastructure scale. GPU utilisation at 60% reflects verifiable demand but across only a few hundred GPUs, which is a rounding error against hyperscaler capacity.

The risk

Chain deprecation is the single highest-impact risk. Akash plans to deprecate its Cosmos chain in late 2026 and migrate to a new chain, with Solana mentioned as a “strong contender” but no governance vote conducted. Migrating an entire blockchain and marketplace is technically complex, operationally destabilising, and could fracture the community. There’s no published technical specification. This isn’t an upgrade. It’s a rebuild.

No formal protocol-level security audit has been disclosed despite the network operating since 2020. That’s five-plus years of production infrastructure without a commissioned security review. The ChainLight authentication bypass vulnerability discovered in May 2024 demonstrates the attack surface is real. A spam attack in March 2025 caused degraded performance, though the network recovered.

Overclock Labs is a US-incorporated entity (Delaware), exposing the project to SEC, CFTC and compute export regulations. Osuri is the key person risk. He’s the public face, strategic driver and open-source credibility anchor. The Starbonds offering introduces new dilution and regulatory dimensions that aren’t yet fully transparent.

My position

I hold AKT. I also have indirect exposure through Venice (which uses Akash GPUs) and Morpheus (which routes compute through Akash providers). The chain migration introduces uncertainty but I believe the project’s technical credibility and real revenue justify the position.

Freedom Score: 66/100

Akash scores 66/100 (C grade). Full methodology at Freedom Score Methodology.

Infrastructure decentralisation (12/20): Active validators and provider counts are tracked live in the metrics above. Permissionless provider onboarding with GPUs across independent providers. Geographic distribution is real. But the provider count is objectively thin and declined through 2025. Starcluster/Starbonds introduces centralisation via enterprise datacentres with “vetted Nodekeepers”. Homenode (Feb 2026 beta) is a decentralising force but too new to measure.

Governance decentralisation (13/20): 300+ on-chain governance proposals with active participation. Proposal #308 had 42.31% turnout, exceeding 33.4% quorum. Community rejected Proposal #302 for lack of transparency, which shows governance has real teeth. 50% community pool tax funds community-directed spending. But Overclock Labs drives the strategic roadmap. Chain migration was announced by the founder, not governance-voted.

Token distribution fairness (8/15): Genesis was insider-heavy (34.5% investors, 27% team) but long-term allocation is better: 70.94% of max supply goes to mining/blockBlockA batch of transactions added to a blockchain at a set interval. Each block cryptographically links to the previous one, creating an append-only chain that can't be rewritten without redoing all the work since.Like a page in a ledger. Every page has a fixed number of entries, every page references the previous page, and once a page is filled and signed off it can't be edited without visibly invalidating every page that came after. The chain is just a very long series of these sealed pages.Read more → rewards. All tokens now fully vested. Total raise was modest by any standard ($4.1M). Not a fair launchFair LaunchA token launch where everyone has the same access from day one. No private sale, no insider allocation, no VC discount. Tokens are distributed by mining, staking, or open public sale at a single price.Like a 100m sprint where everyone starts behind the same line at the same time. Some runners are faster, but nobody gets to start 10 metres ahead because they paid extra. The race is decided by the run, not by who bought the best position.Read more →, but the small raise and majority mining allocation are above average.

Censorship resistance (10/15): Permissionless provider and tenant participation. No KYC required. Reverse auction is on-chain and transparent. But Starcluster introduces “vetted Nodekeepers” as a potential censorship vector. Overclock Labs is US-incorporated (Delaware) and subject to regulatory pressure. Spam attack (March 2025) demonstrated the network can be degraded temporarily.

Data sovereignty (10/15): Tenants fully control deployment configurations and data. Self-custodial Cosmos wallets. No central data collection by the protocol. Homenode lets users control their own hardware. But providers physically host workloads and could theoretically inspect containers. No encryption at the compute layer. ChainLight vulnerability (patched) showed potential for unauthorised deployment access.

Open source and transparency (13/15): Fully open source under Apache 2.0 across 65 repositories. Active development with real commits (Mainnet 16 in March 2026 shipped WASM smart contracts and BME activation). All governance proposals public on GitHub. Quarterly Messari reports and internal blog provide regular transparency. Near-exemplary. But no formal security audit despite five-plus years of operation. Overclock Labs’ corporate financials not public. Starbonds introduces an opaque financial dimension.

Path to improvement

Three changes would materially increase Akash’s score:

  1. Commission a formal security audit. Five years of production infrastructure without a third-party security review is indefensible. The ChainLight vulnerability proved the attack surface exists. An audit by a credible firm would address the most obvious gap in Akash’s otherwise strong transparency position.
  2. Execute the chain migration transparently. Publish a technical specification. Run a governance vote on the destination chain. Provide a detailed migration timeline with milestones. The current state, aspirational timelines with no published roadmap, creates justified uncertainty.
  3. Grow the provider count. The current provider count, declining through 2025, isn’t decentralised cloud. Homenode is a step in the right direction. The target should be hundreds of active providers across multiple geographies before claiming the “decentralised AWS” positioning with a straight face.

Returns Score: 68/100

AKT scores 68/100 (C grade). Full methodology at Returns Score Methodology.

Token utility (16/20): AKT serves three clear functions: payment for compute on the marketplace, staking for validator security and governance, and a requirement for running validator infrastructure. Tenants pay in AKT (or USDC, with AKT settlement), and validators must bond AKT to participate. The utility is genuine and structurally necessary. The network can’t function without the token. The gap to a perfect score is the lack of a broader demand sink beyond compute settlement and staking.

Value accrual (14/20): BME went live on 23 March 2026, and the numbers are now on-chain rather than theoretical. The vault holds roughly 380,000 AKT at a collateral ratio of around 2.4, with a 7-day average net burn of 5,500-6,200 AKT per day. That’s a functioning burn mechanism tied to real revenue. The take rate on compute fees still generates modest income relative to market cap, and staking yields roughly 7.3% nominal (approximately zero real yield after 8% inflation and the 50% community pool tax). But the “coming soon” qualifier is gone. BME is live and burning. The gap to a higher score is scale: current burns offset only a fraction of inflation.

Supply dynamics (14/20): AKT has no hard cap and runs 8% nominal annual inflation. The supply is uncapped: the 388.5 million genesis cap isn’t a ceiling but a starting point, and inflation mints new tokens beyond it indefinitely. BME activated on 23 March 2026 and is now burning AKT on-chain. At current usage levels, effective inflation drops from 8% to roughly 7.1%. Not deflationary, but no longer purely inflationary either. All initial investor and team allocations are fully vested, which removes cliff-dump risk, but the ongoing dilution from staking rewards is real. The 50% community pool tax redirects half of inflation to community spending, which is good governance but does not reduce supply pressure. The token remains inflationary at current adoption levels. Meaningful deflation requires a substantial increase in compute revenue.

Revenue sustainability (14/25): This is Akash’s strongest returns dimension relative to the field. $3.15 million in annual revenue from real customers (Venice, ElizaOS, Morpheus, Gensyn) running real workloads is more than most DeAIDeAIDecentralised AI. An umbrella term for blockchain-based projects that build AI infrastructure (compute, data, inference, models, agents) without a single central provider controlling the system.Like the difference between streaming a movie from Netflix and sharing it via BitTorrent. Netflix is fast and polished but one company controls what you can watch and what you pay. BitTorrent is messier but no single operator can shut you out.Read more → projects can claim. Revenue grew 128% year-over-year. The marketplace has demonstrable product-market fit for permissionless cloud compute at discount prices. The concern is absolute scale: $3.15 million wouldn’t register as a rounding error at AWS. The revenue is real but tiny, and the revenue-to-emission ratio sits below 0.5 (roughly $3.15 million revenue against ~$7 million in annual inflation-driven dilution). The gap between “working product” and “sustainable economy” remains wide.

Liquidity and access (10/15): AKT is listed on Coinbase and Kraken, which provides reasonable access for Western retail and institutional buyers. Volume is adequate for moderate position sizes without excessive slippageSlippageThe difference between the expected price of a trade and the price you actually get when the trade executes. Slippage usually goes against the trader and gets worse with bigger trades or thinner markets.Like trying to buy 1000 bananas at the corner shop. The first few are at the marked price, but by the time you've bought them all you've moved the price up because there are no more bananas left at the original level. The shop has to restock at higher cost.Read more →. The notable absence is Binance, the largest exchange by volume, which limits Asian market discovery and liquidity depth. DEXDEXDecentralised Exchange. A trading venue where token swaps happen entirely through smart contracts, with no central operator holding user funds. The largest DEXes are Uniswap, Aerodrome, Raydium, PancakeSwap, and Curve.Like a self-service vending machine that lets you swap one type of coin for another. The machine sets the exchange rate based on its current stock, anyone can deposit coins to refill it, and there's no clerk behind the counter.Read more → liquidity on Osmosis is moderate. Not thin enough to be a problem, not deep enough to be a strength.

Path to improvement

Three changes would materially increase Akash’s returns score:

  1. Scale BME burn volume. BME is live (23 March 2026) and burning AKT on-chain. But at current usage, net burns reduce effective inflation from 8% to roughly 7.1%. The mechanism works. The question is whether compute revenue grows fast enough to make the burns meaningful. An order-of-magnitude increase in daily spend would start to shift the inflation equation materially.
  2. Secure a Binance listing. The absence from the world’s largest exchange is a concrete liquidity constraint. Binance coverage would meaningfully increase daily volume, improve price discovery, and expand Akash’s visibility in Asian markets where much of the retail crypto activity occurs.
  3. Scale revenue by an order of magnitude. At $3.15 million annual revenue, the revenue-to-emission ratio sits below 0.5: revenue doesn’t even cover the dilution from inflation. Growing revenue toward $30 million would make the BME burn mechanism economically meaningful and support a credible value accrual narrative.

Score change log

DateScoreChangeReason
2026-04-06Returns62 → 68BME live on-chain 23 March 2026. Value Accrual 10→14 (functioning burn mechanism). Supply Dynamics 12→14 (effective inflation reduced to ~7.1%).
2026-03-07Returns66 → 62Returns methodology v2.0 correction. Revenue sustainability 18→14 (revenue-to-emission ratio below 0.5; prior score overstated).
2026-03-02Bothn/aInitial publish. Freedom 66/100, Returns 66/100.

Score changes, new reviews, one editorial take every two weeks. No spam.

Team overview

Greg Osuri CEO & Co-Founder doxxed

IBM consultant (2006-2008), Kaiser Permanente cloud architect (2008), founded AngelHack (world's largest hackathon org, 100k+ developers across 50 cities), co-founded Overclock Labs (June 2015). Testified before US Congress House Committee on AI energy crisis (May 21, 2025). Contributed to California blockchain legislation. Over 10,000 GitHub contributions.

https://x.com/gregosuri
Adam Bozanich CTO & Co-Founder doxxed

QA Automation Engineer at Symantec (2005), Senior Security Engineer at Mu Dynamics (2006), Software Engineer at Xoopit (2008), Lead Software Architect at CHNL Inc. (2011), independent consultant (2012-2014), co-founded Overclock Labs (2015/2016). US patent holder for network protocol fuzzing. Deep expertise in Go, Kubernetes, security.

Overclock Labs, Inc. (Delaware, USA (incorporated June 2015)) · ~115 people
CrunchFundTuesday CapitalAuren Hoffman (angel)Kevin Lin (angel, Twitch co-founder)Cypher CapitalHiro SystemsCosmostation
Total raised: $4.1M
Round Amount Date Lead
Seed $1.3M 2017-11 CrunchFund
Private sale $2.0M 2019 --
IEO (Initial Exchange Offering) $800K 2020-10-15 AscendEX (BitMax)

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-04-27

Technical snapshot

Akash is a four-layer architecture built on a Cosmos SDK appchain (v0.53 + CometBFT, as of Mainnet 14 October 2025). Layer 1 (Blockchain): handles deployment orders, bid placement, lease finalisation, payment settlement, and governance via DPoS consensus. Layer 2 (Application): on-chain records for Deployments, Orders, Bids, and Leases with unique identifiers (DSEQ, OSEQ, GSEQ). Layer 3 (Provider): off-chain Provider Daemon software manages interaction with the chain; Kubernetes orchestration runs Docker containers on provider hardware. Layer 4 (User): Akash Console (web), CLI, AkashML API (OpenAI-compatible managed inference at $0.15/M tokens), and SDL (YAML) configuration. The reverse auction mechanism is the core innovation: tenants publish resource requirements, providers bid competitively, lowest qualifying bid wins, and a lease is created on-chain. Actual compute execution is entirely off-chain.

Consensus Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) via CometBFT (formerly Tendermint). 99 active validators (out of 270 total). ~6 second block time. 167,700 active delegations.
Chain Cosmos SDK v0.53 + CometBFT (Mainnet 14, October 2025)
Open source Yes
Licence Apache 2.0
Languages Go (Cosmos SDK modules), CosmWasm/WASM (enabled Q4 2025)

Commit Activity

55 commits last 52 weeks -100% 4w trend
May Jul Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr 8/wk
Stars
1.1K
Forks
266
Contributors
34
Last Commit
2026-04-15

Community

Discord
23.8K
Telegram
9.1K
X Followers
128.0K

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-04-27

Tokenomics deep dive

Token utility

  • Staking to validators (secure the network, earn inflation rewards)
  • Governance voting (on-chain proposals, 300+ to date)
  • Payment for compute deployments (settlement currency)
  • Provider incentives (earn AKT for serving workloads)
  • Take fee revenue (network collects percentage of deployment spend)
  • BME mechanism (burn AKT to mint ACT compute credits, when activated)

Supply

Supply breakdown: Circulating 74.1%, Locked / Unmined 25.9% 74.12% circulating
Circulating 74.1%
Locked / Unmined 25.9%
Max supply Total supply Circulating Circ. %
-- 391,200,000 290,000,000 74.12%

Allocation

Mining (block rewards) 70.94%
Investors 10.03%
Team & advisors 7.85%
Foundation 5.72%
Ecosystem 2.32%
Testnets 1.45%
Vendors & marketing 1.16%
Public sale (IEO) 0.52%

Method: IEO on BitMax (AscendEX) at $0.3773/$0.7673 per AKT (October 2020). Genesis supply of 100M AKT with breakdown: 34.5% investors, 27% team, 19.7% foundation, 8% ecosystem, 5% testnets, 4% vendors, 1.8% public. Long-term: 70.94% of max supply goes to mining/block rewards. All initial allocations are now fully unlocked. Not a fair launch, but the very modest total raise ($4.1M) and majority mining allocation are notable.

Category % Vesting Cliff
Mining (block rewards) 70.94% Continuous emission via block rewards None
Investors 10.03% 1-year lock then semi-annual graded release 1 year
Team & advisors 7.85% 1-year lock then graduated release 1 year
Foundation 5.72% Partial at TGE, remainder over 24 months None
Ecosystem 2.32% Various grants and ecosystem programmes None
Testnets 1.45% Distributed during testnet phases None
Vendors & marketing 1.16% Various None
Public sale (IEO) 0.52% Unlocked at IEO None

Emissions

Model inflationary
Annual inflation 8%
Emission schedule No halving. Genesis inflation was 54% APY, halving every 3.75 years conceptually. Post-Proposal 283 (March 2025): inflation max reduced to 8%, min to 4%. Cosmos SDK adjusts inflation dynamically to target staking ratio.
Burn mechanism BME (AEP-76): Approved, implementation slated for Q1 2026. Two-token system: AKT (native staking) + ACT (non-transferable, USD-pegged compute credits). Tenants burn AKT to mint ACT at oracle price; providers receive AKT at settlement price. Price appreciation between top-up and payout creates net deflationary pressure. Circuit breaker at collateral ratio < 0.90. At $10M monthly top-ups: immediately purchases ~8.77M AKT, removes from circulation for ~7 days. At current adoption could reduce effective annual supply inflation from 8% to ~5.2%.
Next event BME (Burn-Mint Equilibrium) activation (2026-03-31)

Vesting timeline

1 year 10.03%

Investors cliff

1 year 7.85%

Team & advisors cliff

2026-03-31

BME (Burn-Mint Equilibrium) activation

Staking

Type Delegated Proof of Stake (nominator staking via Cosmos SDK)
Minimum stake 1
Lock-up 21-day unbonding period
Nominal APY 7.3%
Real yield -0.7%
Staking ratio 55%
Risks: Real yield approximately -0.7% to 0% after inflation (staking APY barely offsets dilution); 21-day unbonding locks capital during volatile periods; Slashing risk: 5% for double-signing, 0.01% for prolonged downtime; Validator selection risk -- poorly-run validators can be slashed; Chain migration risk -- staking mechanics may change with new chain; Post-Proposal 283: 50% community pool tax reduces individual staking returns
Slashing: Double-signing: 5% slash. Extended downtime (missing blocks): 0.01% slash and jailing.

AKT currently operates as a standard Cosmos inflationary staking token with real yield near zero after inflation. Post-Proposal 283 (March 2025): inflation max 8%, min 4%, community pool tax 50%. The real tokenomics thesis depends on BME activation (AEP-76, approved, Q1 2026 target): when compute spend is significant enough to burn more AKT than inflation creates, the token becomes deflationary. At $3.15M annual revenue and ~$88M market cap, BME alone cannot drive meaningful deflation yet. All tokens fully vested -- no future unlock cliffs. The gap between the tokenomics vision (revenue-driven burns) and current reality (inflation-dependent staking) is the core investment question. ~96% below ATH. CoinGecko rank #297.

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-04-27

AKT Supply Simulator

Token: AKTSupply: 292.6MMax: UncappedPrice: $0.4859Data: 27 Apr 2026

Scenario Parameters

Revenue growthBase rate: 128% YoY ($1.4M/yr)
128% YoY (current)
Burn efficiencyBase: 6.3K AKT/day (scales with revenue)
1x (current efficiency)
Inflation rateCurrent: ~8.0% annual
8.0% (current)
Staking ratioCurrent: 55% of supply staked
55% (current)
Time horizon
+6.7%
Net annual inflation
Emissions minus burns, annualised
+11.9%
Total supply change (2yr)
292.6M → 327.3M
+11.9%
Liquid supply change (2yr)
Circulating minus staked tokens
N/A
Burn exceeds emission
Burns never exceed emissions in this scenario
62%
Revenue coverage
Revenue as % of emission value (end of period)

Circulating Supply Projection

130M181M232M283M334MM1M5M9M13M17M21M24
CirculatingEffective (minus staked)

Monthly Emissions vs Burns

0536.8K1.1M1.6M2.1MM1: 2.0M AKT emittedM1: 206.1K AKT burnedM2: 2.0M AKT emittedM2: 220.8K AKT burnedM3: 2.0M AKT emittedM3: 236.5K AKT burnedM4: 2.0M AKT emittedM4: 253.3K AKT burnedM5: 2.0M AKT emittedM5: 271.3K AKT burnedM6: 2.0M AKT emittedM6: 290.6K AKT burnedM7: 2.0M AKT emittedM7: 311.2K AKT burnedM8: 2.0M AKT emittedM8: 333.4K AKT burnedM9: 2.0M AKT emittedM9: 357.1K AKT burnedM10: 2.0M AKT emittedM10: 382.5K AKT burnedM11: 2.0M AKT emittedM11: 409.6K AKT burnedM12: 2.0M AKT emittedM12: 438.8K AKT burnedM13: 2.0M AKT emittedM13: 470.0K AKT burnedM14: 2.0M AKT emittedM14: 503.4K AKT burnedM15: 2.0M AKT emittedM15: 539.2K AKT burnedM16: 2.0M AKT emittedM16: 577.5K AKT burnedM17: 2.0M AKT emittedM17: 618.5K AKT burnedM18: 2.0M AKT emittedM18: 662.5K AKT burnedM19: 2.0M AKT emittedM19: 709.6K AKT burnedM20: 2.0M AKT emittedM20: 760.1K AKT burnedM21: 2.0M AKT emittedM21: 814.1K AKT burnedM22: 2.0M AKT emittedM22: 872.0K AKT burnedM23: 2.0M AKT emittedM23: 934.0K AKT burnedM24: 2.0M AKT emittedM24: 1.0M AKT burnedM1M4M7M10M13M16M19M22M24
EmissionsBurns

Revenue vs Emission Value

0%25%50%75%100%150%200%full coverage62%M1M4M7M10M13M16M19M22M24
Revenue as % of token emission value (emissions x price).Above 100% = revenue covers dilution. Below = net dilutive.

Supply projections only. Token price held constant at $0.4859 (snapshot 27 Apr 2026). BME (AEP-76): active since 23 Mar 2026. 7-day avg net burn: 6,322 AKT/day. This is not financial advice.

How to participate

staking basic

Delegate AKT to validators on the Akash chain. Earn inflation rewards (~7.3% APY nominal). Vote on governance proposals through your validator or directly. 50% community pool tax reduces individual returns.

Hardware None (wallet only)
Min. capital $0.3
Est. returns ~7.3% APY nominal (approximately -0.7% to 0% real yield after inflation and 50% community pool tax)
Barriers: Cosmos wallet setup (Keplr/Leap/Cosmostation), 21-day unbonding period, Validator selection research
View guide →
validating advanced

Run an Akash validator node. 99 active validators (of 270 total). Must be in top 99 by stake to be in active set. Earn commission on delegator rewards (typically 5-10%). Top 100 stakers control 63.2% of voting power.

Hardware Robust server infrastructure, near-100% uptime required
Est. returns Commission on delegator rewards (5-10% of staking yield)
Barriers: Must be in top 99 by stake -- competitive, requires millions of AKT, High-availability server infrastructure, Cosmos node operations expertise, Reputation and trust building
View guide →
node operation advanced

Run a cloud provider node on Akash. List spare compute (CPU, GPU, memory, storage) on the marketplace. Earn AKT from tenant deployments via reverse auction. Permissionless -- anyone with qualifying hardware can join.

Hardware Minimum: 8 CPU cores, 16GB RAM, 150GB SSD. Recommended: 12+ cores, 48GB+ RAM, 500GB+ SSD, 3 machines. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, x86_64 only (no ARM). GPU providers need NVIDIA cards. Own RPC node recommended.
Min. capital $15
Est. returns Variable -- depends on hardware, utilisation rate, and bid competitiveness. GPU providers earn more than CPU-only. Provider calculator at akashcalculator.com.
Barriers: Kubernetes administration skills, Server hardware investment, Reliable unmetered internet, Provider setup and maintenance, Competitive bidding against other providers, 50 AKT minimum provider wallet funding
View guide →
node operation intermediate

Homenode: contribute consumer GPU via simplified provider setup. Early access open beta launched February 25, 2026. Install Homenode OS from USB, boot into it. Dual-boot supported. Phase 1 requires RTX 4090 or RTX 5090 minimum, expanding to RTX 20-50 series, GTX 9-16 series, Quadro.

Hardware RTX 4090 or RTX 5090 GPU (Phase 1). Consumer PC with USB boot capability.
Est. returns Not yet disclosed -- early beta
Barriers: Qualifying GPU ownership (RTX 4090/5090 for Phase 1), Beta software -- expect instability, Limited GPU support in early phases
View guide →
using intermediate

Deploy containerised workloads on Akash as a tenant. Console templates for one-click deployments, or custom SDL (YAML) for advanced configurations. AkashML managed inference at $0.15/M tokens (OpenAI-compatible API). 50-85% cheaper than AWS/GCP/Azure.

Hardware None (Console web UI or CLI)
Min. capital $5
Est. returns Cost savings vs centralised cloud. Not a yield-generating activity.
Barriers: Container/Docker knowledge for custom deployments, AKT or USDC deposit for escrow, No managed services (databases, load balancers, CDN) -- raw compute only
View guide →
governance basic

Vote on on-chain governance proposals. 300+ proposals to date. Quorum requirement: 33.40%. Recent proposal (#308) had 42.31% turnout. Community has rejected proposals for transparency concerns (Proposal #302).

Hardware None (wallet only)
Min. capital $0.3
Est. returns No direct returns. Influence over protocol direction.
Barriers: AKT holdings for voting weight, Understanding of proposal implications
View guide →
building advanced

Build on or integrate with Akash. Four funding mechanisms: Community Pool (on-chain treasury, 50% of inflation), Akash Accelerate (grants), Akash Bounties Board, AkashML partnerships. Student Ambassador Program at Princeton, Cornell, USC, UT Austin.

Hardware Development environment
Est. returns Grant funding available. No direct token emissions to builders.
Barriers: Must propose to community pool via governance or apply to grants programme, Go and Kubernetes expertise preferred, Smaller ecosystem than EVM-based alternatives
View guide →

Developer resources

SDK Available
API Available
Docs quality good
Grants Yes

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-04-27

Usage and traction

Active providers
63
Validators
92
Active leases
688
GPU (active / total)
96 / 221
Daily spend (USD)
$4K
Annual revenue
$3.1M
Compute
Active providers and GPU counts tracked live via Akash Console API (see metrics above). 3.1M deployments created in 2025 (466% growth from 2024). 126,025 new leases (2.2% growth). AkashML managed inference operational since November 2025. ~60% GPU utilisation (self-reported).

Data from: Akash Console API (live), Cosmos REST API, Akash 2025 Year in Review (historical) (2026-04-27)

Quarterly breakdown from Messari: Q1 $1M revenue / 868 daily active leases / 553 GPU avg; Q2 $820K / 659 daily leases / 370 GPU avg (post-spam-attack decline); Q3 $852K / 367 GPU avg. Key customers: Venice.ai (GPU inference, billions of tokens), ElizaOS (default inference via AkashChat API), Morpheus (one-click Console template since April 2025), Gensyn (RL-Swarm H100 nodes since May 2025). Revenue of $3.15M against ~$88M market cap gives price-to-revenue ratio of ~28x. Provider count declining through 2025 despite usage growth -- spam attack and market downturn hurt provider economics. Homenode (Feb 2026 beta) aims to reverse this trend.

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-04-27

Community

Governance

Cosmos SDK on-chain governance. Token-weighted voting with delegation. Any AKT holder can submit proposals (with deposit). Validators vote on behalf of delegators by default; delegators can override. Quorum: 33.40%. 50% community pool tax (post-Proposal 282, March 2025). View →

Sentiment

Community is technically oriented and practically focused. Strong conviction around the 'decentralised supercloud' thesis. GPU marketplace and AkashML re-energised interest. Key concerns: 96% price decline from ATH, chain migration uncertainty, declining provider count through 2025, BME activation delay. Venice.ai's adoption as a customer is frequently cited as validation. Community frustrated by the gap between narrative ('decentralised AWS') and current scale (small provider count, few hundred GPUs). Proposal #302 rejection showed governance has teeth.

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-04-27

Sources consulted (34)
S001 Tier 1
Akash Network Official Documentation
documentation · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02
S002 Tier 1
Akash Network Whitepaper
whitepaper · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02
S003 Tier 1
akash-network/node GitHub Repository
github · GitHub · Accessed 2026-03-02
S004 Tier 1
akash-network GitHub Organisation
github · GitHub · Accessed 2026-03-02
S005 Tier 2
CoinGecko -- Akash Network
market data · CoinGecko · Accessed 2026-03-02
S006 Tier 2
CoinMarketCap -- Akash Network
market data · CoinMarketCap · Accessed 2026-03-02
S007 Tier 2
Tokenomist -- Akash Network
market data · Tokenomist · Accessed 2026-03-02
S008 Tier 1
Mintscan -- Akash Network
block explorer · Mintscan · Accessed 2026-03-02
S009 Tier 1
Staking Explorer -- Akash Network
block explorer · Staking Explorer · Accessed 2026-03-02
S010 Tier 1
Akash 2025 Year in Review
documentation · Akash Network Blog · Accessed 2026-03-02
S011 Tier 1
Akash Q4 2025 Report
documentation · Akash Network Blog · Accessed 2026-03-02
S012 Tier 1
AkashML -- Managed AI Inference on the Decentralized Supercloud
documentation · Akash Network Blog · Accessed 2026-03-02
S013 Tier 1
AEP-76: BME (Burn-Mint Equilibrium)
documentation · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02
S014 Tier 1
GitHub Discussion #641 -- Inflation and Tax Parameter Changes
governance · GitHub · Accessed 2026-03-02
S015 Tier 1
Overclock Labs -- About
documentation · Overclock Labs · Accessed 2026-03-02
S016 Tier 2
Messari -- State of Akash Q1 2025
research report · Messari · Accessed 2026-03-02
S017 Tier 2
Messari -- State of Akash Q2 2025
research report · Messari · Accessed 2026-03-02
S018 Tier 2
Messari -- State of Akash Q3 2025
research report · Messari · Accessed 2026-03-02
S019 Tier 2
S020 Tier 2
CertiK Skynet -- Akash Network
research report · CertiK · Accessed 2026-03-02
S021 Tier 2
CryptoRank -- Akash Network IEO Data
market data · CryptoRank · Accessed 2026-03-02
S022 Tier 2
ICO Drops -- Akash Network
market data · ICO Drops · Accessed 2026-03-02
S023 Tier 2
Crunchbase -- Overclock Labs
research report · Crunchbase · Accessed 2026-03-02
S024 Tier 2
FinSMEs: Overclock Labs Secures $1.3M in Seed Funding
news · FinSMEs · Accessed 2026-03-02
S025 Tier 3
The Block: Akash Network to Deprecate Its Cosmos Chain
news · The Block · Accessed 2026-03-02
S026 Tier 3
CryptoTimes: Akash Network Plans Major Migration from Cosmos
news · CryptoTimes · Accessed 2026-03-02
S027 Tier 1
Starcluster by Akash Network
documentation · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02
S028 Tier 3
PR Newswire: Akash Launches Early Access for Homenode
news · PR Newswire · Accessed 2026-03-02
S029 Tier 3
IQ.wiki -- Greg Osuri
news · IQ.wiki · Accessed 2026-03-02
S030 Tier 3
IQ.wiki -- Adam Bozanich
news · IQ.wiki · Accessed 2026-03-02
S031 Tier 1
Greg Osuri Congressional Testimony
documentation · US Congress · Accessed 2026-03-02
S032 Tier 2
DAIC Capital: Akash Network Architecture
research report · DAIC Capital · Accessed 2026-03-02
S033 Tier 2
CryptoCrew Validators: Governance August 2025
news · CryptoCrew · Accessed 2026-03-02
S034 Tier 1
Akash Provider Hardware Requirements
documentation · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02