active other ORA
Ora Protocol logo

Ora Protocol

Verifiable AI oracle bringing inference on-chain via opML. Co-authored ERC-7641 and ERC-7007. Genuine tech from ex-Google/EF team but token down 99.85%, effectively illiquid, and key information undisclosed.

D
Quadrant
Avoid
48
Freedom
/100
D
42
Returns
/100
D
Verdict · Weak on both axes

Genuine technical innovation in verifiable AI inference with ERC standards contributions. But the token is down 99.85%, effectively illiquid, and around half of supply sits in undisclosed allocation.

Strengths
  • + Novel opML mechanism: optimistic verification only runs when results are disputed, much cheaper than zkML
  • + Ex-Google, Ethereum Foundation team; co-authored three Ethereum standards (ERC-7641, ERC-7007, ERC-6150)
  • + Claimed 180K AI inference calls and 20+ projects building on OAO across multiple L2s
Risks
  • 99.85% from ATH with daily volume in the low hundreds of dollars; token is effectively untradeable
  • About half of supply held with no public vesting schedule or allocation disclosure
  • Only the staking contract is audited (Salus, July 2024); no published audit covers the opML or OAO core
Independent verification 7 claims checked · 4 corrected · checked on-chain · as of 2026-08-17
Our call on each · 6 freedom · 5 returns
See Ora Protocol in the integrity board →
Freedom Score
F48/100?

Ora Protocol has genuine technical innovation (opML, ERC standards, verifiable AI inference) but scores poorly on freedom due to opaque token distribution, no verifiable governance, an audit that covers only the staking contract, and significant centralisation in team control. The technology is real but the project's transparency is lacking for a $23M-funded protocol.

Infrastructure decentralisation10/20

500+ nodes running Tora client for inference. opML uses optimistic verification with AnyTrust assumption (one honest validator sufficient). Inference runs off-chain. We did not establish node diversity or geography, and could not enumerate the validator set.

Governance decentralisation5/20 Overstated

The token has governance utility per the docs and nowhere to exercise it: querying the Snapshot Hub API for the plausible ORA space identifiers returns nothing, and no on-chain governance contract is documented. This review found no DAO, no proposal register and no governance forum. Team retains significant control.

Our independent check
They claim

The ORA token carries governance utility. source →

We found

No Snapshot space exists for ORA. Querying the Snapshot Hub GraphQL API for ora.eth, oraprotocol.eth and ora-io.eth returns an empty result, and a name search surfaces no ORA space. Snapshot is the default venue for off-chain token-holder voting, so its absence is a meaningful negative for a project whose token is documented as having governance utility. Direct API query for the plausible space identifiers plus a name search. No on-chain governance contract is documented to check instead.

Our call

Overstated ORA is the project where an audit-absence claim in our record turned out to be wrong, so an absence claim here was worth checking against a named venue rather than restating. It holds: documented governance utility with no venue in which to exercise it. Inflated rather than established, because the gap is between what the token is said to do and what exists, not merely a measurement we took. The limit: Snapshot is the standard venue, not the only conceivable one, and a governance surface we do not know about would not appear in this query.

evidence → signed · as of 2026-08-16 · how it’s signed
Token distribution fairness7/15 Overstated

TGE was community-first (100% float to community). But only 16.9% circulating vs total supply. Full allocation not disclosed — where are the other 83%? $23M raised from VCs with undisclosed terms.

Our independent check
They claim

Community-first TGE (100% float to the community).

We found

Ethereum ORA top-10 holders = 94.7% raw; infra-excluded (the LayerZero OFT adapter) still 81.4% of supply. 50.1% sits in two Gnosis Safe multisigs (0x8Eb8… 27.1% + 0x5e546… 23.0% — team/treasury/foundation); the funding-trace then resolves the third-largest holder, a 26.3% EOA (0x8520…), to Safe-funded (from:SafeProxy), so it too is insider — lifting insider concentration to ~77%. The launch FLOAT may have been community, but the SUPPLY is ~77% insider-controlled (D0). This answers the score's 'where is the other 83%?'. sources/holders.py: top holders + is_contract + labels, classified holder/insider/infra/cex/burn; Safes counted as insider concentration, the OFT bridge adapter excluded as neutral infra. Concentration = raw balance / total_supply. Ethereum is ORA's canonical chain (OFT); a minority is bridged to spokes.

Our call

Overstated Confirms + quantifies the low 7/15 distribution score. The 'community-first' claim describes the initial float, not the supply. The coldstart holder-source's insider/infra split found 50.1% in two team/treasury Safes; the funding-trace (--trace) then resolved the 26.3% EOA to Safe-funded (team/treasury), lifting insider concentration to ~77% — the earlier re-check on that EOA is now answered. Contrast with OriginTrail, where the same-looking top-10 was mostly neutral bridge/staking infra (D1). Attribution 2026-08-13: ORA has no citable published home for this claim. docs.ora.io no longer resolves (NXDOMAIN), and ora.io has pivoted to an agent-managed-funds product whose /token, /tokenomics, /docs and /blog paths all 404. The '100% of float to the community' wording survives only in third-party press, which we will not cite as the project's own claim, and it sits oddly beside the reported ~$20-23M VC raise. Search exhausted 2026-08-13. The '100% of float to the community' wording is real and traces to ORA's own TGE announcement, but that announcement no longer has a reachable home: docs.ora.io does not resolve, ora.io has pivoted away from the token, mirror.xyz/orablog is bot-gated, and the Wayback captures of the Mirror index render as an empty shell. Decrypt's coverage carries the wording but press is not the project speaking. Left unsourced rather than cited to a secondary source. Freshness wired 2026-08-17. The refresher reproduced this verdict's hand-authored figures, which is the check that made wiring safe rather than merely convenient. Caveat carried from the index: the infra-excluded figure rests partly on addresses Blockscout does not label, and a change in how many of those sit in the top ten is a signal to re-trace by hand, not a new measurement.

evidence → signed · as of 2026-08-13 · how it’s signed
Censorship resistance9/15 Verified

opML AnyTrust model provides reasonable censorship resistance — one honest validator sufficient. On-chain fraud proofs. But off-chain inference means computation itself could be censored. Model selection currently limited.

Our independent check
They claim

ORA is a permissionless ERC-20 with no privileged control over holders' balances.

We found

Confirmed at the token layer. The verified source contains no blacklist, no pause modifier, no Ownable and no AccessControl, and the deployed contract reverts on every corresponding call. Nobody can freeze, seize or claw back an ORA balance, and nobody can replace the logic that would allow it, because the contract is not upgradeable. This is a narrower finding than network-level censorship resistance: ORA's inference runs off-chain and is not covered by it. Same runtime probe as the supply verdict, read for the freeze question: absence of pause/blacklist in the verified source, corroborated by reverts on the deployed contract, plus zero EIP-1967 slots to rule out a future upgrade adding them. Scope stated deliberately: this covers the token, not the off-chain inference layer, per the verdict spec's scope-matching rule. Verdict human-set.

Our call

Verified Worth recording because the absence of a freeze function is rarely checked and often assumed. ORA's 9/15 on this dimension is reasoned entirely from the opML AnyTrust model and off-chain inference; the token layer itself is cleaner than that score implies, and the two should be scored as separate scopes at review.

evidence → signed · as of 2026-08-16 · how it’s signed
Data sovereignty7/15

AI inference inputs and outputs are on-chain and verifiable. ERC-7007 enables provenance. But models run off-chain. No user data ownership mechanisms beyond standard blockchain transparency.

Open source transparency10/15 Understated· 2 checks

44 public repos. Core opml repo MIT licensed (315 stars). ERC standards publicly authored. Whitepaper and 15+ research papers published. Some repos lack licences. OAO repo has no licence specified. Audited: Salus Security reviewed the staking contract (report dated 2024-07-13, published in ora-io/audit-report-staking), 2 high / 3 medium / 6 low, 11 of 13 findings resolved. No audit found for the opML or OAO core.

Our independent check
They claim

ORA publishes protocol documentation, a whitepaper and research papers at its documentation site. source →

We found

The documentation host no longer exists. docs.ora.io returns NXDOMAIN from Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8), Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) and Quad9 (9.9.9.9), while ora.io resolves normally from the same resolvers, and Chrome fails to load it. Search engines still index docs.ora.io pages, so published links dead-end. What remains reachable is narrower than documentation: the github.com/ora-io org is live and active (the ora-agent-sdk was pushed 2026-06-24), and the blog moved from mirror.xyz/orablog.eth to paragraph.com/@orablog and still serves, though its most recent post is dated 13 January 2025. Neither carries tokenomics: the live www.ora.io homepage states nothing about supply, allocation, staking or governance, and the blog's launch-methodology post describes f(A.I.)r Launch as a product rather than ORA's own distribution. So the Etherscan-verified contract remains the only reachable first-party publication of ORA's supply. Queried three independent public resolvers for an A record and captured the response status, with a known-good hostname on the same domain as the control, then confirmed the failure in a browser. Separately enumerated the GitHub org and walked the blog's post index to establish what first-party publication survives. Verdict human-set.

Our call

Out of date Not a new discovery: the score log already recorded the dead host on 2026-08-13. What is new is the verdict form, the three-resolver confirmation, and the scope check that establishes what does survive. The finding still matters because our open-source evidence credits published documentation and research at 10/15 while the host serving it is gone, and because it explains why the ORA TGE claim sits in the permanently-unsourced set. Same class as Golem's dead yagna repo. Re-check at the 2026-09-01 review in case this is a migration.

evidence → signed · as of 2026-08-16 · how it’s signed
They claim

ORA publishes third-party security audits of its contracts. source →

We found

Confirmed, and it corrects us rather than ORA. The repository ora-io/audit-report-staking contains ORA_staking-contract_audit_report_2024-07-13.pdf: a Salus Security review of ORA's staking contract at version v5, commit f4ddf14, engagement logged across 21 June to 13 July 2024. It reports 2 high-severity, 3 medium-severity and 6 low-severity issues, with 11 findings marked Resolved, 1 Mitigated and 1 Acknowledged. The audited source sits alongside it in ora-io/staking-contract-audit. The scope is the staking contract only: no published audit was found for the opML or OAO core, and the ORA token contract itself needs none, since it is an unmodified OpenZeppelin ERC20Permit/ERC20Burnable with no admin surface. Enumerated the org's repositories, downloaded the report and extracted its text to read the auditor name, date, contract version, commit and per-severity counts, rather than relying on the repository name. The named-firm-plus-public-report bar in the open-source rubric is met. Verdict human-set.

Our call

Understated Our own evidence said 'No audits found despite $23M funding' and used it to hold open_source_transparency at 10/15. A named firm with a public, dated report clears the rubric's audit bar, so the clause was wrong and has been corrected in both the research JSON and ora.mdx. The score is held pending the 2026-09-01 review because the audit covers staking rather than the opML core, which is the part carrying the thesis. Found because Rob pointed at the ora-io org; the lesson is that a project's GitHub org is a publication surface, and 'no audits found' should always be checked against it before it is written down.

evidence → signed · as of 2026-08-16 · how it’s signed
Returns Score
D 42/100 ?

Overall returns potential is below average at 42/100. Strongest dimension: token utility (12/20). Weakest: liquidity & access (4/15).

Token utility12/20

Node staking, IMO participation, agent creation (Pump.ai), inference fees. Multiple uses but mostly transactional. Staking programme already concluded.

Value accrual8/20

OAO charges fees but flow to ORA holders unclear. ERC-7641 revenue sharing is for IMO tokens (OLM), not ORA. No buy-back or burn for ORA documented.

Supply dynamics10/20 Verified

Fixed 333.3M supply, roughly half circulating after a 110M unlock in December 2025. Remaining allocation and vesting still undisclosed. Down 99.85% from ATH. FDV/MCap ratio 2.0x.

Our independent check
They claim

ORA has a fixed total supply of 333,333,333 coins.

We found

Confirmed, and stronger than 'fixed' usually means. The runtime checks are independent of the published source: both EIP-1967 slots read zero, so the token is not behind a proxy and its logic cannot be replaced; owner(), getOwner(), hasRole(), DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE(), MINTER_ROLE(), minter() and paused() all revert, so there is no owner, no role admin, no minter and no pause; and totalSupply() returns exactly 333,333,333000000000000000000, matching the TOTAL_SUPPLY constant. The verified source carries no mint function at all: ORACoin is ERC20Permit plus ERC20Burnable, and the only _mint calls are the four in the constructor, closed by assert(totalSupply() == TOTAL_SUPPLY). Supply can fall through burns and cannot rise. Probed the deployed contract for every standard control surface (ownership, role admin, minter, pause) and read both EIP-1967 slots directly, so the immutability finding rests on runtime behaviour rather than on reading the project's own source. The source was then read to confirm no mint path exists and to locate the constructor's four _mint calls. Verdict human-set.

Our call

Verified A confirming positive, and the strongest supply posture in the corpus on the code axis: no cap to raise because there is no mint, and no admin to raise it. Note the split this creates with the distribution verdict on the same project: the supply is beyond anyone's control while roughly 77% of it sits with insiders. Those are different questions and both answers stand.

evidence → signed · as of 2026-08-16 · how it’s signed
Revenue sustainability8/25

Ora claims 180K inference calls and 20+ projects. But negligible trading volume and tiny market cap suggest negligible revenue. Revenue model exists at tiny scale.

Liquidity & access4/15

Only Uniswap V3 and PancakeSwap. No CEX listings. Effectively illiquid – daily volume too thin to trade without significant price impact.

Quadrant D — Avoid ?
Price
$0.0049
Market Cap
$808K
FDV
$1.6M
24h Change
+2.0%
+2.0%

Not financial advice. Scores are opinions, not recommendations. Crypto is high-risk – you could lose everything you invest. Full disclaimer.

Embed this rating
Own Your Mind rating: Freedom D 48/100, Returns D 42/100

The badge updates automatically when the score changes.

Token Details
ORAEthereum, Optimism, Base, Arbitrum, Solana, Hyperliquid0x3333...3333
· Updated
On this page
Listen to this episode
On-chain data2026-08-24
333.3M
Token Supply
ethereum
Value Loop

OAO inference requests, opML fraud-proof verification, node stakers

Smart contracts call the Onchain AI Oracle via the IAIOracle Solidity interface and pay inference fees in ORA. Tora client nodes run ML inference off-chain (LLaMA, Stable Diffusion, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen) and post results on-chain. opML finalises optimistically; on dispute, a bisection game pinpoints the disagreement and the Fraud Proof VM resolves the single contested step on-chain. AnyTrust security — one honest validator suffices. Node stakers bond ORA as submitters or verifiers.

ORA Value Loop OAO inference requests, opML fraud-proof verification, node stakers CONTRACTS CALL OAO IAIOracle interface prompt + ORA fee TORA NODES INFER off-chain ML run post results on-chain opML FINALISES bisection-game disputes FPVM resolves on-chain NODE STAKERS ORA bonds Tora nodes submitters + verifiers OPTIMISTIC ML Inference runs off-chain, verify only when challenged, AnyTrust needs one honest node. PROTOCOL DESIGN 333.3M ORA CAP ~16.9% circulating CHAINS ETH · OP · Base · Arbitrum + Solana deployments VERIFICATION opML + FPVM AnyTrust: 1 honest validator STANDARDS AUTHORED ERC-7641 · ERC-7007 + ERC-6150 hierarchical NFT opML optimistic machine-learning verification FPVM Fraud Proof Virtual Machine OAO Onchain AI Oracle ownyourmind.ai/projects/ora Independent DeAI Research

What it does

Ora Protocol (formerly HyperOracle) is a verifiable oracle protocol that brings AI inferenceInferenceRunning a trained AI model to produce an answer. Inference is what happens when you type a prompt into ChatGPT and get a response. The model takes your input, computes a best guess, and returns it.Like asking an expert for their opinion. The training was the decades they spent becoming an expert. The inference is the 30 seconds it takes them to answer your specific question.Read more → on-chain. It enables smart contracts to access AI models (LLaMA, Stable Diffusion, DeepSeek, Mistral, and others) with cryptographic verification that the inference was computed correctly.

The core innovation is opML (optimistic machine learningMLMachine Learning. The branch of AI where systems learn patterns from data instead of being explicitly programmed with rules. Modern AI (LLMs, image generation, recommendation systems) is almost entirely machine learning.Like teaching a child to recognise dogs by showing them thousands of pictures of dogs, instead of writing down a precise rulebook for what makes a dog. The child learns the pattern from examples rather than from instructions.Read more →): an approach that runs ML inference off-chain and posts results on-chain with fraud-proof verification. Think optimistic rollups but for AI computation:

  • Inference runs off-chain for speed and cost efficiency.
  • Results are posted on-chain with an optimistic assumption: correct unless challenged.
  • If challenged, an interactive dispute game uses bisection to pinpoint the disagreement.
  • A Fraud Proof Virtual Machine (FPVM) resolves the single disputed step on-chain.
  • AnyTrust security: the system is secure with just one honest validatorValidatorA computer that runs the full blockchain protocol, verifies transactions, and proposes new blocks. Validators are the workers that keep a Proof of Stake network running, and they earn rewards for doing the work correctly.Like a notary public who witnesses and stamps legal documents. Validators witness transactions, check they follow the rules, and stamp them into the permanent record. A notary who commits fraud loses their license. Validators work the same way, except the license is staked tokens that get slashed on misbehaviour.Read more →.

This is substantially cheaper and faster than zkML (zero-knowledge machine learning), which requires generating a ZKZKZero Knowledge. A class of cryptographic proofs that let you prove something is true without revealing any of the underlying information. ZK lets a network verify a transaction without seeing the transaction's contents.Like proving you know the password to a safe by demonstrating you can open it, without ever saying the password out loud. The verifier learns that you know the password and nothing more.Read more → proof for every computation. opML only invokes the verification mechanism when someone disputes a result.

The product suite includes:

  • OAO (Onchain AI Oracle) – the core verifiable inference service. Developers integrate via Solidity contracts importing the IAIOracle interface.
  • IMO (Initial Model Offering) – tokenises AI models via ERC-7641 (Intrinsic RevShare TokenTokenA digital unit of value or access rights tracked on a blockchain. Tokens can represent ownership in a project, a right to use a service, a share of future revenue, or simply a tradable asset with no underlying claim.Like a physical poker chip a casino issues. The chip itself has no value. What makes it worth something is what it lets you do at the casino, what the casino has promised, and how much other people will pay you for it.Read more →), enabling revenue sharing from on-chain inference fees. The first IMO was $OLM (OpenLM).
  • RMS (Resilient Model Services) – decentralised, verifiable APIAPIApplication Programming Interface. A structured way for one piece of software to talk to another. In DeAI, APIs let applications request inference from a model without running the model themselves.Like a waiter in a restaurant. You don't walk into the kitchen and cook your own meal. You tell the waiter what you want, they tell the kitchen, the kitchen cooks it, and the waiter brings it back. The API is the waiter.Read more → for AI models (DeepSeek, Meta-Llama, Google, Mistral, Qwen). Stage 1 live since January 2025.
  • opAgent – on-chain perpetual agent framework. AI agents with smart contractSmart ContractA program stored on a blockchain that runs automatically when its conditions are met. Smart contracts are how blockchains do anything beyond just transferring tokens — DeFi, NFTs, DAOs, and DeAI infrastructure all run on smart contracts.Like a vending machine. You put in the right input and it produces the expected output, no human operator required. The rules are fixed in the machine itself, anyone can use it, and nobody can stop a transaction in the middle.Read more → wallets, no private key dependency.
  • Pump.ai – permissionless on-chain agent creation, starting at 1 ORA token.

The team co-authored three Ethereum standards: ERC-7641 (Intrinsic RevShare Token), ERC-7007 (Verifiable AI-Generated Content Token), and ERC-6150 (Hierarchical NFTNFTNon-Fungible Token. A unique blockchain-tracked asset where each token is distinguishable from every other. Where regular tokens are interchangeable, NFTs represent unique items like art, collectibles, in-game assets, or domain names.Like the difference between a $20 note and a signed first-edition novel. The notes are interchangeable, any $20 buys the same thing as any other. The book is one of a kind, and its value depends entirely on which specific book it is.Read more →). That is meaningful Ethereum ecosystem contribution.

Founded by Kartin Wong (BS University of Arizona; former software engineer at Google in cryptography and AI, and at TikTok; started crypto ~2011), Norman Von (CTO; supercomputer architecture background, whitehat hacker, authored the ERCERCEthereum Request for Comment. A numbered standard that defines how a specific type of smart contract should behave. Common examples are ERC-20 (fungible tokens), ERC-721 (NFTs), and ERC-4626 (tokenised vaults).Like the standard specification for how a USB plug fits into a USB socket. Any manufacturer can build a USB device, but if they follow the spec, their device works with every other USB-compatible product on the market.Read more → standards), and Suede Kam. Cathie So (Chief Scientist) joined from the Ethereum Foundation’s PSE Team.

Total funding: $23M, comprising a pre-seed ($3M led by HongShan/ex-Sequoia China and dao5, January 2023) and Series A ($20M led by Polychain Capital and HashKey Capital, June 2024).

Value proposition

opML optimistic verification

Runs ML inference off-chain and posts results with fraud-proof verification. Secure with a single honest validator.

Ethereum standards contributions

Co-authored ERC-7641 (RevShare), ERC-7007 (Verifiable AI content) and ERC-6150 (Hierarchical NFT).

Effectively untradeable

99.85% from ATH. Only Uniswap V3 and PancakeSwap. Daily volume in the low hundreds of dollars.

Ora’s opML approach solves a concrete problem: how do you verify that an AI modelModelA trained neural network that takes inputs (text, images, audio) and produces outputs (more text, classifications, generated content). In DeAI the model is the thing that actually does the work.Like a very experienced apprentice who has spent years watching thousands of masters make furniture. They can't explain how they know when a joint is right, but they can make a chair that looks and functions like a Chippendale. The training is invisible. The output is what matters.Read more → produced a specific output without re-running the entire computation on-chain? The optimistic verification model (only verify when disputed) is an elegant engineering choice that makes on-chain AI economically viable.

Ora claims 180,000+ AI inference calls have been processed across Ethereum, Optimism, Base, Arbitrum, and other chains. 500+ nodes run the Tora client. 20+ projects are building on the platform. Ora lists Compound, Ethereum Foundation, Uniswap, and Optimism as integration partners.

The IMO concept is novel: tokenising open-source AI models so that inference usage generates revenue that flows back to model contributors via ERC-7641. This could create legitimate economic incentives for open-source AI development.

The counter-narrative is severe. The ORA token has lost 99.85% from its ATHATHAll-Time High. The highest price a token has ever reached. ATH is usually quoted as a reference point for how far the current price has fallen (or risen) since the peak.Like the record lap time on a racetrack. It tells you what the car has been capable of at its absolute best, not what it will do today. Whether that record gets broken again depends on conditions that may or may not come back.Read more → (TGETGEToken Generation Event. The moment a project's token first becomes tradeable. TGE is when vesting clocks usually start, when liquidity hits exchanges, and when public price discovery begins.Like the IPO day for a startup. Everything that happened before TGE was private valuations and paper agreements. Everything after is the public market deciding what the thing is worth in real time.Read more → day price against current levels). Market cap is a fraction of the $23M in VCVCVenture Capital. Private investors who fund projects at an early stage in exchange for equity or token allocations. VC rounds are typically pre-launch, at steep discounts to any future public price, with multi-year vesting.Like angel investors in a startup who buy shares before the company goes public. They take more risk because the company might fail, so they get a better price. Once the company IPOs they can sell, and the public market pays whatever price it thinks is fair.Read more → funding. Daily trading volume is a few hundred dollars. This token is effectively illiquid. You can’t meaningfully buy or sell ORA without moving the price dramatically.

Critical information is missing:

  • Around half of supply sits with no publicly disclosed allocation. The TGE was community-first (100% of initial float to community), which sounds good, but roughly half of total supply is still outside the float. Where are the other ~167 million tokens? Who holds them? What is the vestingVestingA schedule that locks up tokens allocated to insiders, investors, and team members, releasing them gradually over months or years. Vesting prevents insiders from dumping on public buyers immediately after launch.Like a new employee's stock options at a startup. You don't get all the shares on day one. They unlock over four years so you stick around and do the work rather than cashing out and leaving.Read more → schedule? None of this has been publicly documented.
  • No audits. A $23M-funded protocol with live inference contracts on multiple chains has no publicly available security audit.
  • No governance. Token has governance utility per docs, but no DAODAODecentralised Autonomous Organisation. A way to coordinate decisions and manage a treasury using token-weighted voting instead of a traditional company structure. Token holders propose and vote on changes directly.Like a shareholder-run company where every shareholder can vote on every decision, the votes are public, and the company can't do anything the shareholders don't approve. The coordination is messier than a normal company but nobody has unilateral control.Read more →, no proposals, no voting history exists.

The technology is real and innovative. The transparency around everything else isn’t.

Tokenomics

Circulating supply Live · CoinGecko · 24 Aug 2026
166.3M
Circulating
49.89% of total
333.3M
Total supply

ORA has a fixed supply of 333,333,333 tokens, of which CoinGecko counts roughly half as circulating. A single on-chain transfer of exactly 110,000,000 ORA on 16 December 2025 moved the figure from about 17% to about 50%, and no public disclosure accompanied it. Contract address: 0x33333333FEde34409Fb7f67c6585047E1F653333.

TGE was November 19, 2024 on Uniswap V3. 100% of the initial float was made available for community purchase, with no insider allocation at TGE, inspired by Vitalik’s DAICO model. This is laudable in principle but obscured by one inconvenient reality: around half of total supply remains outside the float with undisclosed allocation.

Known allocation: 10% to ORA Points Programme. The remaining 90% is not formally documented in public sources. $23M was raised from institutional investors (Polychain, HashKey, HongShan, dao5, SevenX, Foresight Ventures), but their token allocation and vesting terms aren’t disclosed.

Token utility includes node stakingStakingLocking up a cryptocurrency to help secure a blockchain network, usually in exchange for rewards. The locked tokens act as a security deposit that can be taken away if the staker misbehaves.Like putting down a large rental deposit for an apartment. You get the money back if you behave, you earn interest while it's locked, and the landlord takes it if you trash the place.Read more → (validators and submitters), IMO participation, protocol governance, agent creation on Pump.ai (1 ORA minimum), and OAO inference fees. The staking programme has already concluded; users can withdraw via Etherscan.

Listed only on Uniswap V3 and PancakeSwap, with no CEX listings. Daily volume is effectively negligible. The FDVFDVFully Diluted Valuation. The market cap a token would have if every token that will ever exist were already in circulation. FDV is what the project would be worth if all locked, vesting, or unminted tokens were trading today.Like valuing a startup based on what every share would be worth if all the unvested employee options had already been exercised. The number is bigger and uglier than the official market cap, but it tells you the true ceiling.Read more →/MCap ratio of 2.0x still signals dilution ahead, though half the overhang of a year ago. The ATH was set on TGE day; the token is down 99.85% from that level. Live price data is displayed above.

How to participate

Beginner
Create an agent on Pump.ai
Intermediate
Build with OAO
Advanced
Run a Tora node

Run a Tora Node. Perform AI inference and submit results for verification. Stake ORA as validator or submitter. GPUGPUGraphics Processing Unit. Originally designed to render video game graphics, GPUs turned out to be exceptionally good at the massively parallel math that AI models need. Modern AI training and inference runs almost entirely on GPUs.Like a factory with 10,000 workers doing the same simple task in parallel, versus a CPU which is more like 10 workers each doing different complex tasks. AI training involves doing simple math a million times per second on a million numbers, which is exactly what the GPU factory is designed for.Read more → hardware required. Technical skill: advanced.

Build with OAO. Integrate verifiable AI inference into smart contracts. Import the IAIOracle Solidity interface. Models available: LLaMA, Stable Diffusion, DeepSeek, Mistral. Technical skill: advanced.

Create AI Agents. Use Pump.ai for permissionless on-chain agent creation. 1 ORA minimum. Technical skill: basic.

Honest assessment

Freedom Score: 48/100

Ora has credible technical contributions to Ethereum but falls short on transparency, governance, and token distribution disclosure.

Infrastructure Decentralisation: 10/20. 500+ nodes running Tora client for inference. opML uses optimistic verification with AnyTrust assumption: one honest validator sufficient. Inference runs off-chain. No evidence of node diversity or geography. Validator set composition unknown.

Governance Decentralisation: 5/20. Token has governance utility per docs but no evidence of an active DAO, governance proposals, or on-chain voting. Team retains significant control. No governance forum found.

Token Distribution Fairness: 7/15. TGE was community-first (100% float to community). Roughly half is now circulating after an undisclosed 110M unlock in December 2025. Full allocation for the remainder not disclosed. $23M raised from VCs with undisclosed token terms.

Censorship Resistance: 9/15. opML AnyTrust model provides reasonable censorship resistance: one honest validator is sufficient. On-chain fraud proofs. However, off-chain inference means computation itself could be censored. Model selection currently limited.

Data Sovereignty: 7/15. AI inference inputs and outputs are on-chain and verifiable. ERC-7007 enables content provenance. Models themselves run off-chain. No user data ownership mechanisms beyond standard blockchain transparency.

Open Source Transparency: 10/15. 44 public repos. Core opml repo MIT licensed (315 stars). ERC standards publicly authored. Whitepaper and 15+ research papers published. Some repos lack licences. Salus Security audited the staking contract (report dated 13 July 2024, published in the project’s own GitHub org): 2 high, 3 medium, 6 low, with 11 of 13 findings resolved. No published audit covers the opML or OAO core, which is the part carrying the thesis.

Returns Score: 42/100

Token Utility: 12/20. Multiple use cases: node staking, IMO participation, agent creation (Pump.ai), governance, inference fees. Token velocity problem: most uses are transactional rather than lock-up. ORA points system adds engagement but dilutes direct token demand. Staking programme already concluded.

Value Accrual: 8/20. OAO charges fees (Model Fee + Callback Fee + Network Fee) but fee flow to ORA token holders is unclear. ERC-7641 revenue sharing exists for IMO tokens (OLM), not for ORA itself. No buy-back or burnBurnPermanently removing tokens from circulation by sending them to an address that no one controls. Burns reduce total supply, which (all else equal) makes each remaining token worth more of the network's value.Like a company buying back its own shares and shredding them. The company's total value stays the same, but each remaining share now represents a slightly bigger slice of that value.Read more → mechanism for ORA documented. Revenue exists in theory but accrual to ORA holders is unproven.

Supply Dynamics: 10/20. Fixed supply of 333.3M, roughly half circulating. The remaining half sits in unrevealed hands, and the 110M that entered the float in December 2025 did so without any published schedule, which is the part that matters: holders cannot anticipate the next one. Token down 99.85% from ATH. No burn mechanism. FDV/MCap ratio 2.0x.

Revenue Sustainability: 8/25. Ora reports 180,000 inference calls and 20+ projects show meaningful usage. RMS offers competitive AI model pricing. Pump.ai enables agent creation. But negligible daily trading volume and an effectively micro-cap token suggest negligible actual revenue. Staking programme already ended. Revenue model exists at tiny scale.

LiquidityLiquidityHow easily a token can be bought or sold without moving the price. High liquidity means you can enter or exit large positions quickly at the quoted price. Low liquidity means even small trades can swing the market.Like the difference between selling a house and selling a share of Apple stock. The house might be worth more on paper, but finding a buyer at that price takes weeks. The Apple share converts to cash in one click.Read more → & Access: 4/15. Only available on Uniswap V3 and PancakeSwap. No major CEX listings. Effectively illiquid; daily volume is a few hundred dollars across all venues. Token available on Ethereum, Base, Solana, Hyperliquid but thinly traded everywhere. Can’t meaningfully trade without moving the price.

Quadrant: B (Moderate Freedom, Low Returns)

Ora sits in Quadrant B: verifiable technical innovation with near-zero commercial traction and an effectively untradeable token.

Key risks

  • 99.85% from ATH. Among the worst price performances in the research universe.
  • Effectively illiquid. Daily volume in the low hundreds of dollars. No CEX listings. Cannot trade without dramatic price impact.
  • About half of supply undisclosed. Full allocation and vesting for the remaining ~167M tokens not publicly documented, and the December 2025 unlock arrived unannounced.
  • No audits. A $23M-funded protocol with live inference contracts on multiple chains has no published security audit.
  • No governance. Governance is claimed but no proposals, votes, or DAO infrastructure exists.
  • Sub-$1M market cap vs $23M raised. The gap between funding and current valuation suggests either catastrophic value destruction or a slow rug by insiders.
  • Core repo activity slowing. opml repo last pushed December 2024, with several months of apparent inactivity on the primary research output.
  • opML verification untested at scale. AnyTrust model is theoretically sound but has not been tested under adversarial conditions at meaningful scale.
  • Competition. Chainlink Functions, Ritual, and other AI oracle approaches compete for the verifiable inference market.

Score change log

DateScoreChangeReason
2026-08-16DataN/ACorrected “No audits found”: Salus Security audited the staking contract (13 July 2024), 2 high / 3 medium / 6 low, 11 of 13 resolved, though no published audit covers the opML core. Open Source Transparency 10/15 held pending monthly review.
2026-08-15DataN/ACirculating supply corrected from 16.9% to 49.89% (~166.3M) and FDV/MCap from 5.9x to 2.0x, after an on-chain transfer of exactly 110,000,000 ORA on 16 Dec 2025 (Ethereum block 24025314). Supply Dynamics 10/20 and Token Distribution Fairness 7/15 held pending monthly review; weighing in docs/quarterly-review-backlog.md.
2026-08-13DataN/AORA has no citable published source for the distribution claim: docs.ora.io no longer resolves and ora.io has pivoted to an agent-funds product with /token, /tokenomics, /docs and /blog all 404. Recorded as unsourced rather than cited to third-party press.
2026-08-10DataN/AWS3 holder-source + funding-trace: authored token_distribution_fairness (inflated, onchain), confirming the 7/15 score. Ethereum top-10 ex-infra 81.4% of supply, ~77% insider — two team/treasury Safes plus a 26.3% EOA the trace resolved to Safe-funded. The “community-first TGE” describes the float, not the concentrated supply. No score change.
2026-06-26DataN/ADefiLlama LlamaAI harvest cross-check, verified independently (api.llama.fi + CoinGecko, coingeckoId ora-coin). Published figures held up: 16.9% circulating (~56.3M of 333.3M), sub-$1M market cap ($264K), $23M total funding. Corrected the FDV/MCap ratio (5.2x → 5.9x; 16.9% circulating mathematically implies 5.9x). Re-verified ATH decline at ~99.9% (CoinGecko -99.91% from $5.37, TGE day 19 Nov 2024). Two DefiLlama warehouse bugs noted but they do not touch our data: the broken coingecko:ora-protocol price map is a slug we do not use (ours, ora-coin, resolves), and the double-logged $20M Series A (summed to $43M under ora+ora-protocol) is already deduped to the correct $23M in our copy. No score change.
2026-03-06BothN/AInitial publish. Freedom 48/100, Returns 42/100.

Score changes, new reviews, one editorial take every two weeks. No spam.

Team overview

Kartin Wong Co-Founder doxxed

BS Information Science & Technology, University of Arizona. Former software engineer at Google (cryptography and AI) and TikTok. Started crypto ~2011.

Norman Von Co-Founder & CTO doxxed

Background in supercomputer architecture. Whitehat hacker. Authored ERC-7007 and ERC-7641 standards.

Suede Kam Co-Founder anon

Limited public information available.

Polychain CapitalHashKey CapitalHongShan (ex-Sequoia China)dao5SevenX VenturesForesight Ventures
Total raised: $23.0M
Round Amount Date Lead
pre-seed $3.0M 2023-01-01 HongShan (ex-Sequoia China), dao5
strategic $20.0M 2024-06-01 Polychain Capital, HashKey Capital

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-08-24

Technical snapshot

Verifiable AI oracle using opML (optimistic machine learning) — off-chain ML computation with on-chain fraud-proof verification. Optimistic execution with interactive dispute game using bisection protocol. Fraud Proof VM for single-step on-chain verification. AnyTrust security (one honest validator sufficient). Core products: OAO (Onchain AI Oracle), IMO (Initial Model Offering via ERC-7641), RMS (Resilient Model Services), opAgent (on-chain perpetual agents), Pump.ai (permissionless agent creation).

Consensus N/A — uses host chain consensus. opML adds optimistic verification layer with fraud proofs.
Chain Ethereum, Optimism, Base, Arbitrum, Solana, Hyperliquid

Commit Activity

0 commits last 52 weeks
Sept Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug 1/wk
Stars
317
Forks
71
Contributors
4
Last Commit
2026-06-21
ora-agent-sdk
Flagship Repo
2024-12-11
opml

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-08-24

Tokenomics deep dive

Token utility

  • Node staking (validators and submitters)
  • IMO participation
  • Protocol governance
  • Agent creation on Pump.ai (1 ORA minimum)
  • OAO inference fees (Model Fee + Callback Fee + Network Fee)

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-08-24

Participation at a glance

node operation advanced

Run a Tora client node to perform AI inference and submit results. Stake ORA as validator or submitter.

Barriers: ORA staking required, GPU hardware for inference
building advanced

Integrate OAO into smart contracts for verifiable AI inference. Import IAIOracle interface in Solidity.

Barriers: Solidity development skills
using basic

Create AI agents on Pump.ai (1 ORA minimum). Use RMS for decentralised AI model access.

Barriers: Requires ORA tokens

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-08-24

Usage and traction

Validators
500

Data from: Alea Research, project docs (2026-03-06)

180,000+ AI inference calls processed. 500+ active nodes. 20+ projects building on platform. Models supported: LLaMA 2/3, Stable Diffusion, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen.

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-08-24

Community

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-08-24